NASA now uses science to study strange objects in the sky. In the past, they did not talk about these objects.

NASA 現在利用科學方法研究天空中的神秘物體。過去，他們並不討論這些物體。

Long ago, the US Air Force studied these objects. Then, the government stopped. They said these objects were not important. They said the objects were just space trash.

很久以前，美國空軍研究過這些物體。隨後，政府停止了研究。他們稱這些物體並不重要。他們說這些物體僅僅是太空垃圾。

In 2017, the Navy showed videos of strange objects. NASA decided to study them again in 2022. They hired a leader for this work. The government also opened old secret files.

2017 年，海軍展示了神秘物體的影片。NASA 決定在 2022 年重新研究。他們聘請了一名負責人領導這項工作。政府也公開了舊的機密文件。

NASA has photos of unknown objects. However, they have no proof of aliens. Some people want all the files to be public. Now, the government tells the truth because people do not trust secrets.

NASA 擁有未知物體照片。然而，他們沒有外星人的證據。有些人希望所有文件都能公開。現在，由於民眾不再信任機密，政府選擇告知真相。

NASA and the military are still sharing data. They want to find the truth about these objects.

NASA 與軍方目前仍在分享數據。他們希望找出這些物體的真相。

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has moved away from ignoring unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) and has instead started using a systematic, scientific method to study them.

美國國家航空航天局（NASA）已不再採取忽視不明異常現象（UAP）的態度，而是開始使用系統化的科學方法來研究這些現象。

In the 1940s and 1950s, UAP reports were handled with some openness, such as during the U.S. Air Force's Project Sign. However, a change in attitude occurred, and government and academic institutions began to discourage these reports. This period of dismissal peaked with the 1969 Condon Report, which led the Air Force to conclude that further research would likely not produce useful scientific data. Even during the Space Shuttle era, sightings were usually explained as space debris or optical illusions, as officials remained skeptical.

在 1940 年代和 1950 年代，UAP 報告的處理相對開明，例如美國空軍的「標誌計畫」（Project Sign）。然而，隨後態度發生了變化，政府和學術機構開始不鼓勵此類報告。這種漠視在 1969 年的《康登報告》（Condon Report）中達到頂峰，導致空軍得出結論，認為進一步研究可能無法產生有用的科學數據。即使在太空梭時代，由於官員保持懷疑，目擊事件通常被解釋為太空碎片或光學錯覺。

This situation began to change around 2017, caused by the release of Navy infrared videos and the discovery of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). Consequently, the U.S. Congress increased its oversight, leading NASA to start an independent UAP study in 2022. The agency also appointed a director of UAP research to use professional observation tools. Furthermore, the Trump administration introduced the PURSUE system, which helped make historical records available to the public.

這種情況在 2017 年左右開始改變，起因於海軍紅外線影片的發布以及「先進航空航天威脅識別計畫」（AATIP）的發現。因此，美國國會加強了監督，促使 NASA 在 2022 年啟動了一項獨立的 UAP 研究。該機構還任命了一名 UAP 研究主管，以使用專業的觀測工具。此外，川普政府引入了 PURSUE 系統，協助將歷史記錄向公眾開放。

Currently, key figures emphasize the need for transparency and data. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that there are images of unknown objects, although he stated that no evidence of alien spacecraft or biological beings has been found. Meanwhile, the Disclosure Foundation is calling for all UAP records to be moved to the National Archives. Professor Kanishkan Sathasivam suggests that because the public trusts the government less, the stigma of reporting UAPs has decreased, forcing the state to manage the story rather than simply denying it.

目前，關鍵人物強調透明度與數據的需求。NASA 局長 Jared Isaacman 確認存在未知物體的影像，儘管他表示尚未發現外星飛船或生物實體的證據。與此同時，「披露基金會」（Disclosure Foundation）呼籲將所有 UAP 記錄移交至國家檔案館。Kanishkan Sathasivam 教授指出，由於公眾對政府的信任度降低，報告 UAP 的恥辱感已有所減少，這迫使政府必須管理相關敘事，而非單純予以否認。

NASA and the Department of Defense are continuing to release UAP data and use scientific research to understand the nature of these mysteries.

NASA 和國防部將繼續發布 UAP 數據，並利用科學研究來了解這些謎團的性質。

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has transitioned from a period of marginalizing unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) to implementing a systematic, scientific framework for their study.

美國國家航空航天局（NASA）已從將不明異常現象（UAP）邊緣化的時期，轉向實施一套系統化、科學化的研究框架。

Historical antecedents indicate that UAP reports were treated with relative openness during the 1940s and 1950s, exemplified by the U.S. Air Force's Project Sign. However, a subsequent paradigm shift occurred wherein academic and governmental institutions began to stigmatize such reports. This era of dismissal culminated in the 1969 Condon Report, which led the Air Force to conclude that further investigations were unlikely to yield significant scientific data. During the Space Shuttle era, sightings such as those during the STS-48 and STS-75 missions were attributed to conventional orbital debris or optical effects, maintaining a status quo of skepticism.

歷史前例顯示，UAP 報告在 1940 與 1950 年代被對待得相對開放，例如美國空軍的「標誌計畫」（Project Sign）。然而，隨後發生了範式轉移，學術與政府機構開始將此類報告標籤化。這個忽視時代在 1969 年的《康登報告》達到頂峰，導致空軍得出結論，認為進一步調查不太可能產生顯著的科學數據。在太空梭時代，如 STS-48 與 STS-75 任務期間的目擊事件，被歸類為傳統的軌道碎片或光學效應，維持著一種懷疑的現狀。

A rapprochement with the subject matter commenced around 2017, precipitated by the disclosure of Navy infrared footage and the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). This shift in the national security establishment prompted increased congressional oversight and the eventual establishment of NASA's independent UAP study in 2022. The agency subsequently appointed a director of UAP research to apply observational capabilities to these phenomena. This institutional pivot is further characterized by the Trump administration's implementation of the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE), which facilitated the declassification of historical records.

與該主題的重新接洽始於 2017 年左右，由海軍紅外線片段的披露以及「先進航空航太威脅識別計畫」（AATIP）的存在所促使。國家安全建制中的這一轉變促使國會加強監督，並最終在 2022 年建立了 NASA 的獨立 UAP 研究。該機構隨後任命了一名 UAP 研究主任，將觀測能力應用於這些現象。這次體制轉向的進一步特徵在於川普政府實施的「總統 UAP 遭遇解密與報告系統」（PURSUE），這促進了歷史記錄的解密。

Stakeholder positioning currently emphasizes transparency and data-driven analysis. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman has confirmed the existence of imagery depicting unknown objects, although he noted that no evidence of recovered extraterrestrial craft or biological entities has been identified. Concurrently, the Disclosure Foundation is advocating for the full transfer of UAP records to the National Archives. Professor Kanishkan Sathasivam posits that the erosion of public trust in government and academia has diminished the stigma associated with reporting UAPs, leading the state to adopt a strategy of narrative management rather than outright denial.

目前利益相關者的定位強調透明度與數據驅動的分析。NASA 局長 Jared Isaacman 已確認存在描繪未知物體的影像，儘管他指出尚未發現回收外星飛船或生物實體的證據。與此同時，「披露基金會」（Disclosure Foundation）正倡導將 UAP 記錄全面移交給國家檔案館。Kanishkan Sathasivam 教授認為，公眾對政府與學術界信任的侵蝕降低了報告 UAP 的標籤化程度，導致國家採取敘事管理策略而非直接否認。

NASA and the Department of Defense continue to declassify UAP data and pursue scientific inquiries to determine the nature of these anomalies.

NASA 與國防部將繼續解密 UAP 數據並追求科學調查，以確定這些異常現象的性質。