This report talks about the plans for people who want to be the Mayor or on the School Board in Knox County.

本報告探討了希望擔任諾克斯郡市長或加入學校委員會的人士之計劃。

Some people want students to learn to read with books and sounds. They want fewer computers for young children. Other people want more money for very young students.

有些人希望學生透過書籍和發音法學習閱讀。他們希望降低幼兒使用電腦的比例。而有些人則希望增加幼童教育的經費。

Some people want to fix old schools in the country. Other people want to save money. For the Mayor, one person wants a 10-year plan for new roads. Another person wants to check how the city spends money.

有些人希望修繕鄉間的舊學校。有些人則希望節省開支。至於市長候選人，一人提出了新道路的 10 年計劃，另一人則希望審查市政府的支出情況。

Some people say librarians should choose the books. Other people say the school board must choose the books. They want to make sure books are right for children's ages.

有些人認為圖書管理員應該負責挑選書籍。而有些人則認為應由學校委員會決定。他們希望確保書籍內容符合兒童的年齡。

The candidates have different ideas. Some want to help everyone equally. Others want to save money and give parents more power.

各候選人的想法各異。有些人希望公平地幫助每個人，有些人則希望節省開支並賦予家長更多權力。

This report summarizes the policy positions and management styles of the candidates running for the Knox County Board of Education and the office of the Mayor.

本報告總結了競選諾克斯郡教育委員會及市長一職候選人的政策立場與管理風格。

Regarding education, candidates disagree on how to improve literacy. Some support the 'science of reading' and phonics, and they suggest reducing screen time for K-5 students to focus more on hands-on learning. In contrast, other candidates emphasize the need for more funding for K-2 students. They also argue that the Third Grade Retention Law causes too much stress for children, suggesting that reading problems often start before kindergarten.

關於教育，候選人在如何提高讀寫能力上意見分歧。部分候選人支持「閱讀科學」與自然拼讀法，並建議減少 K-5 學生的螢幕使用時間，以專注於實作學習。相反，其他候選人則強調 K-2 學生的資金需求。他們還認為《三年級留級法》給孩子帶來過大壓力，並指出閱讀問題通常在進入幼兒園前就已開始。

When discussing school buildings, most candidates agree that decisions should be based on data. However, they use this data differently; some want to modernize old rural schools to match suburban standards, while others focus on saving taxpayer money and managing building lifespans. Meanwhile, the mayoral candidates are debating how to handle urban growth. One candidate proposes a ten-year improvement plan and wants developers to pay more so that current taxpayers do not cover the costs of growth. Another candidate suggests creating a 'STAR Commission' to audit government spending and debt without raising taxes.

在討論校舍問題時，大多數候選人同意決定應基於數據。然而，他們對數據的運用方式各異；有些人希望將舊的鄉村學校現代化以符合郊區標準，而有些人則專注於節省納稅人的錢並管理建築物壽命。與此同時，市長候選人正在辯論如何處理城市增長。一位候選人提出了十年改善計劃，希望開發商支付更多費用，使現有納稅人不必承擔增長成本。另一位候選人則建議成立「STAR 委員會」來審計政府支出與債務，而非調高稅率。

Finally, there are different views on library materials. Some candidates believe librarians should have professional independence, whereas others assert that the school board should have the final say to ensure books are age-appropriate. Some even suggest a rating system similar to movie ratings. To handle political tension on the board, candidates propose different methods, such as using a mediator or removing political language to focus on finding practical solutions.

最後，對於圖書館教材存在不同看法。部分候選人認為圖書管理員應擁有專業自主權，而其他人則主張學校委員會應擁有最終決定權，以確保書籍符合年齡適宜性。有些人甚至建議建立一套類似電影分級的評級系統。為了處理委員會內的政治緊張局勢，候選人提出了不同方法，例如聘請調解人或移除政治化語言，以便專注於尋找實際的解決方案。

In conclusion, the candidates offer very different visions for the county, ranging from a focus on professional independence and equality to a focus on strict spending and parental control.

總結來說，候選人對該郡提出了截然不同的願景，從專注於專業自主與平等，到專注於嚴格支出與家長管控。

This report synthesizes the policy positions and administrative philosophies of candidates seeking office for the Knox County Board of Education and the Mayoralty of Knox County.

本報告綜合了競選諾克斯縣教育局委員及縣長的候選人之政策立場與行政理念。

Regarding pedagogical priorities, a divergence exists between candidates concerning the implementation of literacy benchmarks. Several candidates advocate for the 'science of reading' and systematic phonics, with some specifically proposing a reduction in digital interface exposure for K-5 students to prioritize tactile learning. Conversely, other candidates emphasize the necessity of expanded K-2 funding and the mitigation of the psychological impact associated with the Third Grade Retention Law, suggesting that literacy deficits originate prior to kindergarten.

在教學重點方面，候選人對於如何落實讀寫能力基準存在分歧。數位候選人主張「閱讀科學」與系統化發音教學，部分候選人明確建議減少 K-5 學生接觸數位介面，以優先考慮觸覺學習。相反地，其他候選人則強調擴大 K-2 資金投入的必要性，以及減輕與《三年級留級法》相關的心理影響，認為讀寫能力的缺陷在進入幼兒園之前便已產生。

Fiscal allocation strategies for school infrastructure are characterized by a shared emphasis on data-driven decision-making. However, the application of this data varies; some candidates prioritize the equitable modernization of aging rural facilities to match suburban standards, while others emphasize the maximization of taxpayer value and the strategic management of facility lifespans. In the mayoral race, the discourse centers on the tension between rapid urban expansion and infrastructure capacity. One candidate proposes a ten-year public capital improvement plan and the imposition of greater financial accountability on developers to prevent the subsidization of growth by existing taxpayers. Another mayoral candidate proposes the establishment of a 'STAR Commission' to conduct a comprehensive audit of government expenditures and debt obligations without increasing the tax burden.

學校基礎設施的財政分配策略以共同強調數據驅動的決策為特徵。然而，數據的應用方式有所不同；部分候選人優先考慮將老舊的鄉村設施進行公平現代化以匹配郊區標準，而其他候選人則強調將納稅人價值最大化以及設施壽命的策略管理。在縣長競選中，論述核心在於快速城市擴張與基礎設施容量之間的緊張關係。一位候選人建議擬定十年公共資本改善計劃，並要求開發商承擔更大的財務責任，以防止現有納稅人補貼增長。另一位縣長候選人則建議成立「STAR 委員會」，在不增加稅賦負擔的情況下，對政府支出與債務義務進行全面審計。

Governance of intellectual materials in libraries reveals a spectrum of oversight models. Some candidates advocate for the restoration of professional autonomy to librarians, while others maintain that the school board must exercise final authority to ensure materials are age-appropriate, with some proposing a rating system analogous to cinematic classifications. Regarding board dynamics, candidates suggest various modalities for navigating political polarization, ranging from the adoption of a mediator role to the deliberate removal of partisan terminology to facilitate solution-oriented discourse.

圖書館知識材料的管理揭示了不同的監督模式。部分候選人主張恢復圖書管理員的專業自主權，而其他候選人則堅持學校委員會必須行使最終決定權，以確保材料符合年齡適宜性，部分人甚至建議建立一套類比於電影分級的評級制度。關於委員會的互動，候選人針對如何應對政治極端化提出了各種模式，從採取調解人角色到刻意移除黨派術語，以促進以解決問題為導向的對話。

The candidates present contrasting visions of governance, oscillating between a focus on professional autonomy and equity and a focus on fiscal austerity and parental oversight.

候選人們呈現了截然不同的治理願景，在關注專業自主權與公平性，以及關注財政緊縮與家長監督之間擺盪。