Disney made a new Moana movie with real people. It is the number one movie in North America, but it did not make much money.

迪士尼拍了一部真人版的新《海洋之心》電影。雖然在北美排名第一，但並沒有賺到太多錢。

The movie cost 250 million dollars to make. In the first weekend, it made 95 million dollars in the world. This is less money than other Disney movies.

這部電影的製作成本為 2.5 億美元。在首個週末，全球共賺進 9,500 萬美元。這比其他迪士尼電影的收益要低。

Some people did not like the movie. They said it is exactly like the cartoon. Only 34 percent of critics liked it. But many parents and children liked it.

有些人並不喜歡這部電影。他們認為這部片與動畫版完全一樣。只有 34% 的評論家表示喜歡，但許多家長和孩子則很喜歡。

Other movies were in theaters at the same time. Toy Story 5 and Minions & Monsters were also there. Also, Moana 2 came out only 19 months ago. Many people stayed home to watch it on TV.

當時有其他電影也在上映，例如《玩具總動員 5》和《小黃人與怪物》。此外，《海洋之心 2》在 19 個月前才剛推出，許多人選擇留在家中透過電視觀看。

The movie is number one, but it did not make a lot of money. Disney needs a better plan for its movies.

雖然排名第一，但並沒有賺到很多錢。迪士尼需要為其電影制定更好的計劃。

The Walt Disney Company's live-action version of Moana has opened as the highest-earning film in the North American market, although its total revenue was lower than expected.

迪士尼公司的真人版《海洋之歌》在北美市場上映，雖然成為最高票房電影，但總收入低於預期。

The movie cost approximately US$250 million to produce. During its opening weekend, it earned US$43 million in the US and US$52 million across 50 international markets. This global total of US$95 million is significantly lower than the success of previous Disney remakes, such as The Lion King and Beauty and the Beast. However, the domestic opening was similar to the Snow White adaptation, which earned US$42.2 million.

這部電影的製作成本約為 2.5 億美元。在上映首週末，它在美國賺得 4,300 萬美元，並在 50 個國際市場賺得 5,200 萬美元。全球總計 9,500 萬美元，明顯低於先前迪士尼重拍作品的成功程度，例如《獅子王》和《美女與野獸》。然而，其北美首周表現與《白雪公主》改編版相似，後者賺得 4,220 萬美元。

Some analysts emphasize that the film's reception suffered because it was too similar to the original animated movie. Critics described the production as a near-exact copy, which led to a low rating of 34 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. In contrast, audience data showed a different opinion; PostTrak reported that 63 percent of viewers and 78 percent of parents would recommend the film, while CinemaScore gave it an A- grade.

部分分析師強調，該片的受歡迎程度不佳是因為與原版動畫電影太過相似。評論家將其描述為近乎完美的複製品，導致在 Rotten Tomatoes 上的評分僅為 34%。相比之下，觀眾數據顯示了不同的看法；PostTrak 報告指出 63% 的觀眾和 78% 的家長會推薦該片，而 CinemaScore 則給予 A- 的評級。

Furthermore, market saturation was a major factor in the disappointing opening. The release of other PG-rated movies, such as Toy Story 5 and Minions & Monsters, created strong competition for family audiences. Additionally, the film was released only 19 months after Moana 2, which may have made audiences feel that seeing it in theaters was not necessary, especially since the franchise is easily available on streaming platforms.

此外，市場飽和是導致首周表現令人失望的主要因素。其他 PG 級電影的上映，例如《玩具總動員 5》和《小小天才與怪物》，為家庭觀眾創造了激烈的競爭。此外，該片在《海洋之歌 2》上映後僅 19 個月便推出，這可能使觀眾覺得沒有必要前往電影院觀看，尤其是該系列在串流平台上非常容易取得。

Although Moana took the top spot in North America for the weekend, its modest earnings suggest there may be problems with Disney's current live-action strategy and the timing of its releases.

雖然《海洋之歌》在該週末奪得北美冠軍，但其平庸的收益表明迪士尼目前的真人版策略與上映時機可能存在問題。

The Walt Disney Company's live-action iteration of Moana has debuted as the top-earning film in the North American market, despite achieving lower-than-anticipated revenue figures.

迪士尼公司出品的真人版《海洋之歌》雖然在北美市場奪得冠軍，但其營收低於預期。

The production, which incurred an estimated cost of US$250 million, generated US$43 million domestically and US$52 million across 50 international territories during its opening weekend. This cumulative global debut of US$95 million represents a significant deviation from the commercial trajectory of previous high-performing Disney remakes, such as The Lion King and Beauty and the Beast. The domestic opening is quantitatively comparable to the performance of the Snow White adaptation, which recorded US$42.2 million.

該片估計成本為 2.5 億美元，在開片週末於美國本土創造 4,300 萬美元營收，並在 50 個國際市場創造 5,200 萬美元營收。全球首週累計 9,500 萬美元的成績，與先前表現優異的迪士尼翻拍片（如《獅子王》與《美女與野獸》）的商業軌跡相比有顯著偏差。本土開片表現與《白雪公主》翻拍版量級相當，後者記錄為 4,220 萬美元。

Analytical perspectives suggest that the film's reception was compromised by a lack of creative divergence from the original animated work. Critical assessments characterized the production as a near-exact replication of the source material, resulting in a 34 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Conversely, consumer data indicates a divergence in sentiment; PostTrak reported that 63 percent of viewers and 78 percent of parents would recommend the film, while CinemaScore assigned it an A- grade.

分析觀點認為，該片因缺乏與原版動畫作品的創意區隔，導致評價受損。評論界將此製作定性為原素材的近乎完全複製，導致在 Rotten Tomatoes 僅獲得 34% 的評分。相反地，消費者數據顯示情感傾向有所分歧；PostTrak 報告指出 63% 的觀眾與 78% 的家長會推薦該片，而 CinemaScore 則賦予其 A- 評級。

Market saturation is identified as a primary contributing factor to the suboptimal opening. The presence of concurrent PG-rated offerings, specifically Toy Story 5 and Minions & Monsters, created a competitive environment that likely constrained family viewership. Furthermore, the temporal proximity of the release—occurring only 19 months after the debut of Moana 2—may have diminished the perceived necessity for a theatrical experience, particularly given the high accessibility of the franchise on streaming platforms.

市場飽和被視為開片表現不理想的主要因素。同期上映的 PG 級作品（特別是《玩具總動員 5》與《小黃人與怪物》）創造了競爭環境，可能限制了家庭觀眾的數量。此外，上映時間與《海洋之歌 2》首映僅相隔 19 個月，加上該系列在串流平台上的高可得性，可能降低了觀眾對電影院觀影體驗的必要感。

While Moana secured the top domestic position for the weekend, its modest financial returns highlight potential systemic issues regarding Disney's current live-action strategy and market timing.

雖然《海洋之歌》奪得該週末的北美榜首，但其平庸的財務回報凸顯了迪士尼目前的真人版策略與市場時機可能存在系統性問題。