People Sue University of Calgary and Police
People Sue University of Calgary and Police
Introduction
Nine people are suing the University of Calgary, the police, and the city. This is because the police removed a protest camp in May 2024.
Main Body
Students made a camp on May 9, 2024. They wanted the university to stop giving money to companies in Israel. The university said the camp was not safe. The police removed the camp very quickly. The people who sue say the police were too violent. They say the police used sticks and chemicals. Some people got hurt and felt very sad. They say the police broke the law. The university says the police did the right thing. A special team looked at the event. They did not find proof of big injuries. The university and police do not want to talk more now.
Conclusion
The people want more than $331,000 in money. They also want the court to say their rights were broken.
Learning
🕒 The 'Past Story' Pattern
When we tell a story about something that already happened, we often change the action word by adding -ed.
Look at these changes from the text:
- Want Wanted*
- Remove Removed*
- Look Looked*
Wait! Some words are rebels. They don't use -ed:
- Make Made*
- Say Said*
- Get Got*
- Do Did*
Quick Tip for A2: If you see a date like May 9, 2024, your brain should immediately switch to these 'Past' versions of words to describe the event.
Vocabulary Learning
Lawsuit Filed Against University of Calgary and City Authorities Over Encampment Removal
Introduction
Nine people have started a lawsuit against the University of Calgary, the Calgary Police Service, and the City of Calgary after a pro-Palestinian encampment was forcibly removed in May 2024.
Main Body
The legal case began after a protest was set up on May 9, 2024, near MacEwan Hall. The Calgary Student Movement demanded that the university reveal and stop its financial connections to Israeli organizations. Although the university administration said they supported freedom of speech, they emphasized that encampments were not allowed for safety and operational reasons. Consequently, the university issued trespass notices, and the Calgary Police Service (CPS) removed the site within 24 hours. Experts noted that this response was much faster than at other universities in North America. The plaintiffs, who include students and alumni, claim that the police used excessive force, such as batons and chemical sprays, even though the group was already preparing to leave. The lawsuit describes various physical and mental injuries, including concussions and trauma. Furthermore, the plaintiffs assert that the removal violated their constitutional rights to peaceful assembly. The legal action also challenges the truthfulness of statements made by former Police Chief Mark Neufeld and alleges that the police used illegal surveillance. Responses from official organizations have been different. A third-party review by MNP described the university's decision to call the police as a planned and documented process. However, the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team finished an investigation in November 2024 and stated it could not confirm the reports of serious injuries. The defendants have mostly refused to comment because the legal process is still ongoing, though the university has promised to review the claim.
Conclusion
The plaintiffs are now asking for more than $331,000 in damages and a legal statement that their constitutional rights were violated.
Learning
⚡ The 'Professional Logic' Jump
An A2 student usually connects ideas with simple words like and, but, or because. To reach B2, you need to use Logical Connectors (Transition words). These make your writing sound objective, academic, and sophisticated.
Look at these shifts from the text:
| A2 Style (Basic) | B2 Style (Professional) | The Effect |
|---|---|---|
| But the administration said... | Although the administration said... | Creates a complex contrast in one sentence. |
| So the university issued... | Consequently, the university issued... | Shows a direct cause-and-effect result. |
| Also, the plaintiffs say... | Furthermore, the plaintiffs assert... | Adds a new point with more authority. |
| But MNP said it was planned... | However, a third-party review... | Signals a formal disagreement. |
🛠️ Vocabulary Upgrade: From 'General' to 'Precise'
B2 fluency is about precision. Stop using "generic" verbs and start using "context-specific" ones.
-
Instead of "Say" Use "Assert" or "Claim"
- A2: They say the police were mean.
- B2: The plaintiffs assert that the removal violated their rights.
- Why? "Assert" implies a strong statement made during a legal or formal argument.
-
Instead of "Start" Use "Initiate" or "File"
- A2: They started a lawsuit.
- B2: Nine people have filed a lawsuit.
- Why? "File" is the correct technical term for legal documents.
💡 Pro Tip: The 'Passive' Shield
Notice the phrase: "...an encampment was forcibly removed."
At A2, you might say: "The police removed the camp." At B2, we often use the Passive Voice to focus on the action or the victim rather than the actor. This is essential for reporting news or writing formal complaints where the focus is on the event itself.
Vocabulary Learning
Litigation Initiated Against University of Calgary and Municipal Authorities Regarding Encampment Removal.
Introduction
Nine individuals have filed a lawsuit against the University of Calgary, the Calgary Police Service, and the City of Calgary following the forced removal of a pro-Palestinian encampment in May 2024.
Main Body
The legal action originates from a demonstration established on May 9, 2024, near MacEwan Hall, wherein the Calgary Student Movement sought the disclosure and divestment of university financial ties to Israeli entities. While the university administration asserted support for freedom of expression, it maintained that encampments were prohibited for operational and safety reasons. Consequently, trespass notices were issued, and the Calgary Police Service (CPS) commenced the removal of the site within approximately 24 hours. This rapid escalation is noted by academic observers as being more immediate than responses at other North American institutions. The plaintiffs—comprising students, alumni, and professional supporters—allege that the CPS employed excessive force, including the use of batons, shields, and chemical irritants, despite claims that the group was already preparing to vacate. The suit specifies a range of physical and psychological injuries, including concussions and trauma, and asserts that the removal constituted a violation of Charter rights regarding peaceful assembly and association. Furthermore, the litigation challenges the veracity of statements made by former Police Chief Mark Neufeld and alleges subsequent unlawful surveillance and arbitrary issuance of summonses. Institutional and regulatory responses have been divergent. A third-party review by MNP characterized the university's decision to engage police as a documented and deliberate process. Conversely, the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team concluded an investigation in November 2024, stating it could not verify allegations of serious injuries. The defendants have largely declined to comment, citing the pending nature of the litigation, although the university has committed to a formal review of the claim.
Conclusion
The plaintiffs are currently seeking over $331,000 in damages and a judicial declaration of constitutional rights violations.
Learning
The Architecture of 'Institutional Distance'
To transition from B2 to C2, a learner must move beyond meaning and begin analyzing posture. In the provided text, the most sophisticated linguistic phenomenon is the use of Nominalization as a tool for Depersonalization.
At B2, a writer describes actions: "The police removed the camp quickly." At C2, the writer transforms the action into a noun phrase to create a clinical, detached atmosphere: "This rapid escalation is noted..."
🧩 The Linguistic Shift
Observe how the text strips away the 'human' actor to emphasize the 'process'. This is the hallmark of high-level legal and academic English:
- "Litigation Initiated Against..." Instead of "People sued...", the act of suing becomes a noun (Litigation), making the event feel like an objective administrative fact rather than a personal conflict.
- "The removal constituted a violation..." The verb constitute acts as a bridge between a physical event (removal) and a legal category (violation), removing the need for a subject (e.g., "The police violated the law").
- "...the pending nature of the litigation" Here, nature serves as a sophisticated 'buffer' word, adding a layer of abstraction that suggests formality and caution.
⚖️ C2 Synthesis: The 'Abstract Subject'
When aiming for C2, replace direct subject-verb-object patterns with Abstract Subjects. This allows you to discuss volatility or conflict while maintaining an air of impartial authority.
| B2 Approach (Direct/Emotional) | C2 Approach (Nominalized/Clinical) |
|---|---|
| The police used too much force. | The employment of excessive force is alleged. |
| The university decided to call the police. | The decision to engage police was a documented process. |
| They are asking for $331,000. | Plaintiffs are seeking damages in excess of $331,000. |
Scholarly Insight: This stylistic choice is not merely about 'fancy words'; it is about Epistemic Modality. By nominalizing, the author distances themselves from the truth-claim, attributing the action to the process rather than the person, which is essential for maintaining neutrality in high-stakes reporting.