US Government Says Yale Medical School Broke the Law

A2

US Government Says Yale Medical School Broke the Law

Introduction

The US Department of Justice says Yale Medical School did something illegal. They say the school used race to choose students.

Main Body

The government studied the school for one year. They say Yale chose students based on race. This is against the law. Some students had lower grades and test scores but still got in. Other students had higher grades but did not get in. The government says this is not fair. The government wants all schools to stop these rules. They say doctors must be the best students to keep people safe. Other schools have the same problem.

Conclusion

The government wants Yale to change its rules. If Yale does not change, the government will take them to court.

Learning

⚖️ The "Opposite" Pattern

In this story, we see two groups of people. To reach A2, you need to show contrast (how things are different).

The Pattern:

  • Higher \rightarrow More high
  • Lower \rightarrow Less high

Look at the text:

  1. "Some students had lower grades..."
  2. "Other students had higher grades..."

How to use this in real life: If you are talking about prices, sizes, or scores, use these words to compare two things:

  • The red shirt is higher in price than the blue shirt.
  • My test score was lower than yours.

Quick Tip: When you see "Some...", look for "Other..." to find the difference!

Vocabulary Learning

government
A group of people who control a country, state, or community.
Example:The government made a new law.
school
A place where people learn.
Example:My sister goes to school every day.
students
People who study at a school.
Example:The students finished their homework.
law
A rule that people must follow.
Example:It is illegal to drive without a license.
grades
Marks that show how well someone did in school.
Example:She got good grades on her test.
scores
Numbers that show performance.
Example:He had a high score on the exam.
fair
Just and equal.
Example:The judge made a fair decision.
rules
Instructions that say what is allowed.
Example:The rules say no phones in class.
doctor
A person who helps people feel better.
Example:The doctor gave me medicine.
people
Humans in general.
Example:Many people came to the event.
safe
Not dangerous.
Example:The playground is safe for children.
change
To make something different.
Example:We need to change the plan.
court
A place where legal cases are heard.
Example:The case went to court.
year
A period of 12 months.
Example:It was his first year at university.
study
To learn about something.
Example:I study for my exams.
choose
To pick something.
Example:She chose the blue shirt.
based
Decided on something.
Example:The decision was based on facts.
against
In opposition to.
Example:He was against the new policy.
lower
Smaller in amount or value.
Example:The lower score was disappointing.
higher
Greater in amount or value.
Example:The higher grade was impressive.
not
Negative.
Example:She is not happy.
stop
To end.
Example:Please stop talking.
same
Identical.
Example:They have the same car.
problem
A difficult situation.
Example:There is a problem with the engine.
take
To carry or bring.
Example:She will take the book to school.
use
To employ.
Example:Use your notes during the test.
race
A category of people based on physical traits.
Example:The race was based on color.
illegal
Not allowed by law.
Example:It is illegal to smoke here.
department
A part of an organization.
Example:The department handles finances.
justice
Fairness.
Example:The justice system is important.
medical
Related to health.
Example:He works in a medical clinic.
broke
Broken.
Example:The vase broke when it fell.
B2

Department of Justice Claims Racial Bias in Yale School of Medicine Admissions

Introduction

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has accused the Yale School of Medicine of breaking federal civil rights laws by using race as a factor when choosing which students to admit.

Main Body

The DOJ asserts that Yale University violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After a year-long investigation, the agency claims that the university used a 'holistic' review process to prioritize applicants based on their race. According to the DOJ, this was a way to avoid the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that banned affirmative action in higher education. Furthermore, the agency argues that Yale intentionally ignored judicial orders by continuing to maintain diverse student groups. Data provided by the DOJ shows a clear difference in admission requirements. For the 2023 to 2025 classes, Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted with lower average GPAs and test scores than white and Asian students. For example, in the most recent class, Black students had a median GPA of 3.88, while Asian and white students had medians of 3.98 and 3.97. Consequently, the DOJ suggests that a Black applicant was up to 29 times more likely to get an interview than an Asian applicant with the same academic records. This action is part of a larger government plan to remove Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs from universities. The DOJ emphasized that prioritizing race over academic skill in medical school is a public safety risk. Similar warnings have been sent to UCLA, and other top universities like Harvard and Stanford are also facing investigations. However, some academics argue that the government is being too strict and that universities should still be allowed to consider a student's personal growth and character.

Conclusion

The DOJ is currently trying to reach a voluntary agreement with Yale University, but it may start legal action if the university does not follow federal law.

Learning

🚀 The 'Connector' Secret: Moving from Simple to Sophisticated

At an A2 level, you likely use and, but, and because to link your ideas. To reach B2, you need to use Transition Signals. These are words that tell the reader how two ideas are connected (cause, contrast, or addition).

🛠 The B2 Upgrade Map

Look at how this article avoids simple words and uses "Professional Bridges" instead:

Instead of... (A2)Use this... (B2)Example from Text
And / AlsoFurthermore"Furthermore, the agency argues..."
SoConsequently"Consequently, the DOJ suggests..."
ButHowever"However, some academics argue..."

🔍 Why this matters

When you use "Consequently," you aren't just saying something happened; you are showing a logical result. When you use "Furthermore," you are building a stronger argument by adding a second, more important point.

💡 Pro Tip: The Comma Rule

Notice that these B2 words are almost always followed by a comma when they start a sentence:

  • Wrong: extHoweverthegovernmentisstrict.\text{Wrong: } ext{However the government is strict.}
  • Right: extHowever,thegovernmentisstrict.\text{Right: } ext{However, the government is strict.}

⚡ Quick Vocabulary Shift

To sound more B2, replace basic verbs with "Precise Verbs" found in the text:

  • Don't say say \rightarrow Use assert or emphasize.
  • Don't say change \rightarrow Use violated (when talking about laws).
  • Don't say look at \rightarrow Use investigation.

Vocabulary Learning

assert (v.)
to state something confidently and forcefully.
Example:The company asserted that the new policy would improve efficiency.
violated (v.)
to break or fail to follow a rule or law.
Example:The company violated safety regulations and faced fines.
holistic (adj.)
considering all parts or aspects of something.
Example:The holistic review looks at a student's background, not just grades.
prioritize (v.)
to give more importance or preference to something.
Example:The committee will prioritize applicants with strong research experience.
intentionally (adv.)
on purpose, deliberately.
Example:He intentionally left the door open to let the cat in.
judicial (adj.)
relating to judges or courts.
Example:The judicial process ensures fair trials.
diverse (adj.)
including many different types or kinds.
Example:The campus has a diverse student body.
voluntary (adj.)
done by one's own free choice.
Example:She signed the voluntary agreement without hesitation.
legal (adj.)
connected with the law.
Example:They hired a legal team to handle the case.
investigations (n.)
the process of looking into something to find facts.
Example:The investigations revealed several discrepancies.
academic (adj.)
relating to education or scholarship.
Example:He has an academic background in physics.
median (n.)
the middle value in a set of numbers.
Example:The median score of the test was 75.
likely (adj.)
having a good chance of happening.
Example:It is likely to rain this afternoon.
public (adj.)
relating to the whole community.
Example:Public safety is a top priority for the city.
safety (n.)
the condition of being protected from danger.
Example:Safety measures were implemented at the factory.
risk (n.)
the possibility of danger or loss.
Example:There is a risk of injury when climbing.
character (n.)
the mental and moral qualities that define a person.
Example:Her character made her a respected leader.
equity (n.)
fairness or justice in treatment.
Example:The organization promotes equity in hiring.
inclusion (n.)
the act of including or being included.
Example:Inclusion of all voices is essential.
bias (n.)
an unfair preference or prejudice.
Example:The study found a bias in the sample selection.
admissions (n.)
the process of accepting students into a school.
Example:Admissions were competitive this year.
factor (n.)
an element that contributes to a result.
Example:Experience is an important factor in hiring.
average (adj.)
typical or the mean value.
Example:The average temperature this week was 20°C.
applicant (n.)
a person who applies for something.
Example:The applicant submitted all required documents.
review (n.)
a formal assessment or examination.
Example:The review will be conducted next month.
C2

Department of Justice Allegations Regarding Racial Preferences in Yale School of Medicine Admissions

Introduction

The United States Department of Justice has accused the Yale School of Medicine of violating federal civil rights laws by utilizing race-based criteria in its student selection process.

Main Body

The Department of Justice (DOJ), via Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, asserts that Yale University has contravened Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This determination follows a year-long investigation into the institution's admissions protocols. The DOJ contends that the university employed a 'holistic' review process as a mechanism to identify and prioritize applicants based on race, utilizing racial proxies to circumvent the 2023 Supreme Court mandate prohibiting affirmative action in higher education. Specifically, the agency alleges that the university's continued maintenance of diverse cohorts, despite previous claims in an amicus brief that such diversity was unattainable without explicit racial consideration, constitutes evidence of a willful failure to comply with judicial directives. Quantitative data cited by the DOJ indicates a significant disparity in admission probabilities. For the 2023, 2024, and 2025 cohorts, the agency reports that Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted with lower median grade-point averages and standardized test scores than their white and Asian counterparts. For instance, in the most recent class, Black students exhibited a median GPA of 3.88 and 95th percentile MCAT scores, whereas Asian and white students recorded medians of 3.98 and 3.97 respectively, with 100th percentile MCAT scores. The DOJ further posits that a Black applicant possessed odds of securing an interview up to 29 times higher than an Asian applicant with equivalent academic credentials. This action is situated within a broader administrative strategy to eliminate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) frameworks in academia. The DOJ has characterized the prioritization of race over academic excellence in medical education as a public safety concern, given the federal funding involved in physician training. This enforcement action follows similar notifications sent to the University of California, Los Angeles, and coincides with ongoing investigations into Stanford, Ohio State, and the University of California, San Diego, as well as litigation against Harvard University. Conversely, some academic perspectives suggest the administration's interpretation of the Supreme Court ruling is overly restrictive, arguing that the consideration of individual character and personal growth remains permissible.

Conclusion

The DOJ is currently seeking a voluntary resolution agreement with Yale University, while reserving the right to initiate judicial proceedings to ensure compliance with federal law.

Learning

The Architecture of 'Legalistic Evasion' & Precision Verbs

To move from B2 to C2, a student must stop using generic verbs (say, think, do) and begin using performative verbs—words that do not just describe an action, but define the legal or intellectual status of that action.

⚡ The 'Precision Pivot'

Look at how the text replaces common descriptions with high-density academic alternatives:

  • Contravened \rightarrow instead of broke the law.
  • Circumvent \rightarrow instead of get around.
  • Posits \rightarrow instead of suggests or claims.

At the C2 level, posits is superior because it implies the proposal of a theoretical basis for an argument, whereas claims often suggests a lack of evidence. To circumvent is not merely to avoid, but to find a strategic, often deceptive, way around a restriction.

🔍 Linguistic Phenomenon: The Nominalized Shield

Note the phrase: "...constitutes evidence of a willful failure to comply with judicial directives."

Rather than saying "Yale willfully failed to comply," the author uses nominalization ("constitutes evidence of a willful failure"). This is a hallmark of C2 'Institutional English.' It shifts the focus from the actor (the university) to the abstract concept (the failure).

Why this matters for C2 mastery: Nominalization allows the writer to maintain an objective, detached distance. It transforms a direct accusation into a formal observation of a state of affairs. This is essential for writing high-level legal briefs, academic papers, or diplomatic correspondence.

🛠️ Syntactic Sophistication: The 'Contrastive Anchor'

Observe the final paragraph's transition: "Conversely, some academic perspectives suggest..."

B2 students often rely on However or On the other hand. The use of Conversely serves as a logical anchor that signals a complete inversion of the previous premise, rather than just a simple disagreement. It frames the debate as two opposing systemic interpretations rather than two differing opinions.

Vocabulary Learning

contravened (v.)
To violate or go against a law, rule, or agreement.
Example:The university contravened Title VI by using race-based criteria.
holistic (adj.)
Considering the whole rather than parts.
Example:The admissions committee adopted a holistic review process.
proxies (n.)
Substitutes or stand-ins used in place of something else.
Example:The school used racial proxies to circumvent the new mandate.
circumvent (v.)
To find a way around a rule or obstacle.
Example:They sought to circumvent the Supreme Court's prohibition.
amicus (n.)
A person or group offering advice or information to a court.
Example:The amicus brief argued that diversity was unattainable without racial consideration.
disparity (n.)
A significant difference or inequality.
Example:The report highlighted a disparity in admission probabilities.
median (n.)
The middle value in a set of numbers.
Example:The median GPA for Black applicants was 3.88.
percentile (n.)
A statistical measure indicating the value below which a given percentage of observations fall.
Example:Black students achieved a 95th percentile MCAT score.
posits (v.)
To propose or put forward as a fact or principle.
Example:The DOJ posits that the university's practices violate the law.
equivalent (adj.)
Equal in value, amount, meaning, or function.
Example:Asian applicants had equivalent academic credentials.
prioritization (n.)
The act of arranging or dealing with something in order of importance.
Example:The prioritization of race over merit raised concerns.
excellence (n.)
Outstanding quality or performance.
Example:The policy aimed to promote academic excellence.
enforcement (n.)
The act of ensuring compliance with laws or regulations.
Example:The DOJ's enforcement action seeks to rectify violations.
notifications (n.)
Formal notices or messages.
Example:The agency sent notifications to other universities.
coincides (v.)
To happen at the same time.
Example:The investigation coincides with similar probes elsewhere.
litigation (n.)
Legal proceedings or lawsuits.
Example:The university faced litigation over alleged discrimination.
restrictive (adj.)
Limiting or constraining.
Example:Critics argued the court's ruling was overly restrictive.
voluntary (adj.)
Done by choice, not forced.
Example:The agreement was reached on a voluntary basis.
initiating (v.)
Starting or beginning.
Example:The DOJ is initiating judicial proceedings.
judicial (adj.)
Relating to courts or judges.
Example:The case involves judicial directives.
proceedings (n.)
Formal legal processes.
Example:The proceedings will determine compliance.
compliance (n.)
Conformity with rules or laws.
Example:The university must ensure compliance with civil rights statutes.
civil (adj.)
Relating to citizens or public affairs.
Example:Civil rights laws protect against discrimination.
rights (n.)
Entitlements or freedoms.
Example:The lawsuit seeks to protect students' rights.
laws (n.)
Statutes enacted by a governing body.
Example:The institution must adhere to federal laws.
criteria (n.)
Standards or principles for evaluation.
Example:Admissions criteria included race-based considerations.
selection (n.)
The act of choosing.
Example:The selection process was criticized.
process (n.)
A series of actions or steps.
Example:The process involved multiple reviews.
determination (n.)
A decision or conclusion.
Example:The DOJ's determination was based on evidence.
investigation (n.)
A systematic inquiry.
Example:The investigation lasted a year.
protocols (n.)
Established procedures or guidelines.
Example:The institution's protocols were examined.
mechanism (n.)
A means or method for achieving a result.
Example:The mechanism used was a holistic review.
identify (v.)
To recognize or determine.
Example:The agency identified applicants by race.
applicants (n.)
Individuals applying for admission.
Example:Applicants submitted transcripts.
racial (adj.)
Pertaining to race.
Example:Racial bias was alleged.
mandate (n.)
An official order or requirement.
Example:The mandate prohibits affirmative action.
prohibiting (v.)
Preventing or forbidding.
Example:The court is prohibiting certain practices.
affirmative (adj.)
Supporting or endorsing a particular viewpoint.
Example:The policy was deemed affirmative action.
strategy (n.)
A plan to achieve a goal.
Example:The university's strategy aimed to diversify.
eliminate (v.)
To remove or get rid of.
Example:The DOJ seeks to eliminate DEI frameworks.
frameworks (n.)
Structured systems or guidelines.
Example:The frameworks guided admissions.
public (adj.)
Open to all; relating to the community.
Example:Public safety concerns were cited.
safety (n.)
Condition of being free from harm.
Example:The policy prioritized safety.
concern (n.)
A worry or issue.
Example:The concern was about fairness.
federal (adj.)
Pertaining to the national government.
Example:Federal funding was at stake.
funding (n.)
Financial support.
Example:Funding was tied to compliance.
training (n.)
Instruction or education.
Example:Physician training requires funding.
perspectives (n.)
Viewpoints or angles.
Example:Perspectives varied on the issue.
character (n.)
Nature or traits.
Example:Character was considered in admissions.
growth (n.)
Development or progress.
Example:Growth in diversity was desired.
permissible (adj.)
Allowed or acceptable.
Example:The action remained permissible under certain conditions.
resolution (n.)
A decision or agreement to settle a dispute.
Example:The resolution was reached after negotiations.
agreement (n.)
A mutual understanding or contract.
Example:The agreement was voluntary.