Government Says Medical Schools Use Race to Pick Students
Government Says Medical Schools Use Race to Pick Students
Introduction
The US Department of Justice says Yale and UCLA medical schools use race to choose students. They say this is against the law.
Main Body
The government looked at test scores and grades. They say Black and Hispanic students got in with lower scores than White and Asian students. They say this is not fair. The government wants to stop programs that help different groups of people. They stopped giving money to some schools because of these programs. But the schools disagree. They say test scores are not the only important thing. They say doctors from different backgrounds help sick people get better.
Conclusion
The government wants the schools to follow the law. The schools say their rules are good.
Learning
💡 The 'People' Word Pattern
In this text, we see words for groups of people. To reach A2, you need to know how to talk about who someone is.
The Word List:
- Students People who learn
- Doctors People who fix health
- Government People who make laws
⚡️ Action Words (Verbs)
Look at how the text describes changing or stopping things. This is a key A2 skill:
- Use (to employ something) Use race to pick students.
- Stop (to end something) Stop programs.
- Help (to make things easier) Help sick people.
⚖️ Opposite Ideas
English uses simple words to show a fight or a difference of opinion:
The Government says... It is against the law. BUT (This word changes the direction!) The Schools say... Their rules are good.
Vocabulary Learning
Department of Justice Claims Racial Discrimination in Medical School Admissions
Introduction
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has accused the Yale School of Medicine and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) of using illegal race-based preferences during their admissions process.
Main Body
The DOJ asserts that these universities have avoided the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action by using indirect methods to favor Black and Hispanic applicants. This claim is based on a statistical analysis of admissions from 2023 to 2025, which the DOJ says shows a clear difference in academic requirements. Specifically, the DOJ alleges that Black and Hispanic students were admitted with lower average MCAT scores and GPAs than White and Asian candidates. For example, the DOJ claims that at Yale, a Black applicant had a much higher chance of getting an interview than an Asian applicant with similar grades. These legal actions are part of a larger government strategy to remove Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. This plan includes new executive orders and the cancellation of federal grants that focus on health inequalities. Furthermore, the administration has stopped funding for several Ivy League schools because they allegedly did not follow these new rules. On the other hand, medical educators and legal experts argue that the DOJ's focus on standardized tests is not an accurate way to measure a doctor's ability. They emphasize that 'holistic' admissions—which include community involvement and situational tests—are necessary to create a workforce that can treat diverse populations. These supporters suggest that medical schools should have different standards than undergraduate colleges because a diverse group of doctors leads to better health outcomes for marginalized patients.
Conclusion
The DOJ continues to demand that these schools follow federal law, while Yale and UCLA insist that their admissions processes are fair and correct.
Learning
⚡ The 'Nuance Shift': Moving from Simple to Sophisticated
At the A2 level, you usually say "The government says..." or "The schools say...". To reach B2, you need to stop using the word 'say' for everything. Look at how this article describes a legal battle using Reporting Verbs.
🧩 The Vocabulary Upgrade
Instead of 'say', the text uses these high-impact verbs:
- Asserts To say something strongly and confidently.
- Alleges To say something is true, even though it hasn't been proven yet (very common in law!).
- Emphasize To give special importance to a point.
- Insist To refuse to change your opinion.
🛠️ Practical Application: The 'B2 Logic'
Notice the difference in energy between these two sentences:
A2 Style: The DOJ says the schools are wrong. The schools say they are fair.
B2 Style: The DOJ alleges that the schools are using illegal methods, while the universities insist that their processes are fair.
Why this matters: Using alleges instead of says tells the reader that there is a legal dispute. It adds precision.
💡 Quick Strategy: 'The Holistic Flip'
The article mentions "holistic admissions."
- A2 meaning: Looking at everything.
- B2 context: A comprehensive approach that considers all factors, not just one (like a test score).
When you want to describe a 'complete' or 'all-around' view of a problem in your speaking exams, use holistic instead of 'all the parts'.
Vocabulary Learning
Department of Justice Allegations of Racial Discrimination in Medical School Admissions
Introduction
The United States Department of Justice has accused the Yale School of Medicine and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) of utilizing illegal race-based preferences in their admissions processes.
Main Body
The Department of Justice (DOJ) asserts that these institutions have circumvented the 2023 Supreme Court ruling prohibiting affirmative action by employing racial proxies to favor Black and Hispanic applicants. This contention is predicated on a statistical analysis of the 2023, 2024, and 2025 admissions cycles, which the DOJ claims reveals a significant disparity in academic credentials. Specifically, the DOJ alleges that Black and Hispanic students were admitted with lower median MCAT scores and GPAs than White and Asian candidates; in the case of Yale, the DOJ claims a Black applicant had substantially higher odds of securing an interview than an Asian applicant with comparable credentials. These actions are situated within a broader administrative strategy to dismantle Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This strategy includes the issuance of executive orders targeting DEI programs, the termination of federal grants related to health disparities, and the application of 'disparate impact theory' to argue that race-neutral policies yielding diverse outcomes are discriminatory. Furthermore, the administration has suspended funding to several Ivy League institutions over alleged non-compliance with these directives. Conversely, medical educators and legal scholars argue that the DOJ's reliance on standardized testing is an imprecise measure of physician competency. They contend that 'holistic' admissions—incorporating situational judgment tests like the AAMC PREview Exam and community engagement—are essential for producing a workforce capable of addressing health disparities. Proponents of this view suggest that medical schools may be subject to different standards than undergraduate institutions due to the direct correlation between physician diversity and improved patient health outcomes for marginalized populations.
Conclusion
The DOJ continues to demand federal law compliance, while Yale and UCLA maintain the integrity of their respective admissions frameworks.
Learning
The Architecture of Legalistic Abstraction
To move from B2 to C2, a student must stop seeing words as mere 'vocabulary' and start seeing them as discursive markers. The provided text is a masterclass in nominalization and distanced attribution, a hallmark of high-level academic and legal English.
⚡ The 'C2 Pivot': From Action to Concept
B2 learners describe actions: "The DOJ says that schools used race to help students." C2 masters describe phenomena: "This contention is predicated on a statistical analysis..."
Observe the phrase "predicated on." While a B2 student might use "based on," the C2 choice implies a logical foundation or a prerequisite condition. It transforms a simple relationship into a formal architectural claim.
🔍 Anatomy of the 'Hedged' Allegation
In professional C2 discourse, directness is often replaced by precision through attenuation. Look at the cluster of verbs used here:
- Asserts Circumvented Alleges
These aren't synonyms. Asserts implies a confident statement of fact; circumvented implies a strategic evasion of a rule; alleges indicates a claim that has not yet been proven in court. The ability to switch between these based on the legal status of the claim is the difference between a fluent speaker and a masterful one.
🛠️ Syntactic Sophistication: The 'Substantive' Noun Phrase
Consider the phrase: "...the application of ‘disparate impact theory’ to argue that race-neutral policies yielding diverse outcomes are discriminatory."
Breakdown for the C2 Aspirant:
- The Nominal Head: "The application of..." (Starting with a noun rather than a verb creates an objective, detached tone).
- The Participial Modifier: "...policies yielding diverse outcomes..." (Using yielding instead of which yield compresses the sentence, increasing information density—a key requirement for C2 proficiency).
Scholarly Insight: The text employs counter-positioning (e.g., "Conversely") not just to show contrast, but to signal a shift in the epistemological framework—moving from the DOJ's quantitative logic (scores/GPAs) to the educators' qualitative logic (holistic competency).