New Court for Russian Leaders
New Court for Russian Leaders
Introduction
Thirty-six countries want to start a special court in The Hague. This court will punish Russian leaders for starting the war in Ukraine.
Main Body
A group of ministers met and made a plan. They will pick judges and decide on the money for the court. This new court is necessary because the International Criminal Court cannot judge Russia for starting the war. The court wants to punish the top leaders. These are the president, the prime minister, and the foreign minister. It also wants to punish top military leaders. Many European countries and the EU agree with this plan. The EU will give 10 million euros. However, four EU countries did not agree. Some leaders cannot have a trial if they are still in power.
Conclusion
The court will start when the countries change their laws and find more money.
Learning
🚩 THE 'ACTION' LIST
Look at how we describe people doing things in this text. To reach A2, you need to connect a person to an action.
1. The Simple Pattern Person Action Thing
- Countries want a court
- Ministers made a plan
- EU will give money
🕒 NOW vs. LATER
Notice how the words change when we talk about the future (things that haven't happened yet).
| Now/General | Future (Coming Soon) |
|---|---|
| They pick | They will pick |
| The court starts | The court will start |
Quick Tip: Just put "will" before the action to move it into the future. Simple!
📦 USEFUL WORD GROUPS
Instead of learning one word, learn the 'job' group:
- President Top leader
- Prime Minister Top leader
- Foreign Minister Top leader
- Judge Court person
Vocabulary Learning
Creation of a Special Tribunal to Prosecute the Crime of Aggression Against Ukraine
Introduction
Thirty-six countries, mostly from Europe, have agreed to create a special tribunal in The Hague. The goal of this court is to prosecute Russian leaders for the crime of aggression.
Main Body
The plan was officially agreed upon during a meeting of foreign affairs ministers from the Council of Europe. They approved a resolution to create a management committee, which will be responsible for approving the budget, setting internal rules, and appointing judges and prosecutors. This new tribunal is necessary because the International Criminal Court (ICC) has a legal gap; while the ICC can prosecute war crimes, it cannot judge the crime of aggression against a country like Russia that has not signed the ICC treaty, especially since Russia can use its veto power in the UN Security Council. Therefore, the tribunal will focus on 'leadership crimes' committed by the president, prime minister, foreign minister, and top military commanders. While there is broad support, the agreement is not complete. The signatories include 34 European states, Australia, Costa Rica, and the European Union, which has promised €10 million in funding. However, some EU members, such as Bulgaria, Hungary, Malta, and Slovakia, did not join. Furthermore, the court faces a challenge because the top three Russian leaders cannot be tried in their absence while they are still in office, although lower-ranking military officials can be. To help victims, this legal effort will work alongside a Register of Damages and an International Claims Commission. Meanwhile, in a separate legal battle, a Moscow court ruled in favor of the Russian Central Bank in a case against Euroclear regarding frozen assets.
Conclusion
The tribunal will now begin its work once national laws are updated and permanent funding is secured.
Learning
⚡ The 'B2 Leap': Moving from Simple Actions to Complex Systems
At the A2 level, you describe what happened. At the B2 level, you describe how things are organized and why they function that way.
Look at this sentence from the text:
"They approved a resolution to create a management committee, which will be responsible for approving the budget..."
🛠️ The Power Move: "Responsible for + [Verb]-ing"
Instead of saying "Their job is to..." (A2), B2 students use Responsible for.
The Rule: When you use responsible for, the word that follows must be a Noun or a Gerund (the -ing form). You cannot use an infinitive (to do).
- ❌ Wrong: He is responsible for to pay the bills.
- ✅ Correct: He is responsible for paying the bills.
🚀 Practical Application (From the text to your life)
The Article's Logic:
- Management Committee responsible for approving (budget), setting (rules), appointing (judges).
Your Transition: Start replacing "I have to..." or "My job is..." with this structure to sound more professional and fluent:
- Work: "I am responsible for managing the team."
- Home: "My partner is responsible for cleaning the kitchen."
- Study: "The teacher is responsible for grading the exams."
🔍 Bonus: The 'Legal Gap' Concept
Notice the phrase "legal gap." This is a compound noun (Adjective + Noun). B2 fluency involves using these clusters to summarize complex ideas quickly. Instead of saying "a problem where the law is missing something," just say "a legal gap."
Try using these B2-style clusters:
- Funding gap (not enough money)
- Knowledge gap (something you don't know yet)
Vocabulary Learning
Establishment of a Special Tribunal for the Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression Against Ukraine
Introduction
Thirty-six sovereign entities, primarily European, have committed to the formation of a special tribunal headquartered in The Hague to prosecute Russian leadership for the crime of aggression.
Main Body
The initiative was formalized during a Council of Europe meeting of foreign affairs ministers, where a resolution defining the management committee's structure and functions was endorsed. This committee is tasked with budgetary approval, the adoption of internal regulations, and the appointment of judicial and prosecutorial personnel. The tribunal is designed to address a jurisdictional lacuna within the International Criminal Court (ICC); while the ICC may prosecute war crimes, it lacks the mandate to adjudicate the crime of aggression against a non-signatory state such as Russia, particularly when the latter utilizes its UN Security Council veto. Consequently, the proposed body focuses on 'leadership crimes' attributed to the executive 'troika'—the president, prime minister, and foreign minister—alongside high-ranking military commanders. Institutional framework and stakeholder positioning reveal a broad but incomplete consensus. Signatories include 34 European states, Australia, Costa Rica, and the European Union, the latter of which has pledged €10 million in funding. However, several EU member states, including Bulgaria, Hungary, Malta, and Slovakia, have abstained. Furthermore, the efficacy of the tribunal is complicated by the immunity of the 'troika' from trials in absentia while remaining in office, although such proceedings may be conducted against subordinate military officials. This judicial effort is complemented by a Register of Damages and an International Claims Commission to facilitate victim compensation. Parallel to these legal developments, the Russian Central Bank has successfully pursued a claim in a Moscow court against Euroclear for approximately 18.2 trillion rubles, citing the illegality of EU-imposed asset freezes.
Conclusion
The tribunal's operationalization now depends upon the completion of national legislative procedures and the securement of sustained funding.
Learning
⚖️ The Architecture of Precision: Nominalization and Legalistic Density
To move from B2 to C2, a student must transition from describing actions to conceptualizing states. The provided text is a masterclass in High-Density Nominalization—the process of turning verbs (actions) into nouns (concepts) to achieve an objective, authoritative, and impersonal tone.
🔍 The 'Lacuna' of Meaning
Observe the phrase: "...address a jurisdictional lacuna within the International Criminal Court."
At a B2 level, a writer might say: "The ICC has a gap in its rules, so it cannot judge this case."
C2 Analysis: The author replaces the verb "have a gap" with the noun "lacuna." This isn't just about using a 'fancy word'; it is about shifting the focus from the act of missing to the existence of a void. This allows the writer to treat a complex legal failure as a tangible object that can be "addressed."
🛠️ Deconstructing the "Action-to-Entity" Shift
Look at how the text transforms dynamic processes into static institutional frameworks:
| B2 Dynamic Approach (Verbal) | C2 Conceptual Approach (Nominal) | Linguistic Effect |
|---|---|---|
| They formalized the initiative. | The initiative was formalized... | Shifts focus to the status of the project. |
| They need to get funding. | ...the securement of sustained funding. | Transforms a need into a requirement. |
| People are agreeing, but not all. | ...a broad but incomplete consensus. | Turns a social behavior into a measurable state. |
🎓 The C2 Power Move: The "Abstract Subject"
In the sentence: "Institutional framework and stakeholder positioning reveal a broad but incomplete consensus," the subjects are not people, but concepts (framework and positioning).
The Mastery Key: C2 proficiency requires the ability to let ideas perform the actions in a sentence. Instead of saying "We can see that the framework shows...", the framework itself becomes the actor. This eliminates the subjective "I" or "We" and creates the veneer of absolute objectivity essential for academic, legal, and diplomatic discourse.
🚀 Application for the Learner
To bridge the gap, stop asking "Who did what?" and start asking "What phenomenon is occurring here?"
Example Transformation:
- B2: The government decided to change the law, which made people angry.
- C2: The government's legislative amendment precipitated widespread public indignation. (Note: 'Decided to change' 'Legislative amendment'; 'Made people angry' 'Precipitated public indignation')