Christian, Muslim, and traditional religious groups in Africa are working together. They want new laws to stop LGBTQ rights. They say they want to protect the family.

非洲的基督教、伊斯蘭教及傳統宗教團體正展開合作。他們希望通過新法律來阻止 LGBTQ 權利，並聲稱這是為了保護家庭。

These different groups use the words 'family values'. This helps them work together even if they believe different things. In Ghana, Catholic, Pentecostal, and Muslim leaders asked for a law against LGBTQ people.

這些不同的團體都使用了「家庭價值觀」一詞，這讓他們即使信仰不同也能共同合作。在迦納，天主教、五旬節派和伊斯蘭教領袖要求制定反 LGBTQ 法律。

Groups from the USA also help these African leaders. In Uganda and Senegal, religious groups worked together to make these laws. They want one big rule book for all of Africa.

來自美國的團體也為這些非洲領袖提供幫助。在烏干達和塞內加爾，宗教團體聯手制定了這些法律。他們希望全非洲都能有一套統一的規則。

This is strange because these groups say they hate Western ideas. But they use help from the USA. Also, some USA groups do not like Muslims in their own country, but they work with Muslims in Africa.

這很奇怪，因為這些團體聲稱厭惡西方思想，但他們卻接受美國的幫助。此外，某些美國團體在自己的國家並不喜歡穆斯林，但在非洲卻與穆斯林合作。

Now, different religions use a smart plan. They want the same anti-LGBTQ laws in every African country.

現在不同的宗教採取了一個精明的計劃，希望每個非洲國家都實行同樣的反 LGBTQ 法律。

A strategic partnership between Christian, Muslim, and traditional religious groups is currently working across Africa to introduce restrictive laws regarding LGBTQ rights, claiming they are protecting traditional family values.

目前一個由基督教、穆斯林和傳統宗教團體組成的策略夥伴關係，正於全非洲推動限制 LGBTQ 權利的法例，聲稱此舉是為了保護傳統家庭價值。

This movement works by bringing together different religious groups through the use of the term 'family values.' This common language allows groups with very different beliefs to work together politically, as they frame their goals as a way to defend local culture against liberal influences from abroad. For example, in Ghana, a coalition of Catholic, Pentecostal, and Muslim leaders successfully pushed for an anti-LGBTQ bill. Furthermore, this effort was supported by the 4th African Inter-Parliamentary Conference, which was organized alongside the African Bar Association and the US-based group Family Watch International.

這項運動透過使用「家庭價值」一詞，將不同的宗教團體凝聚在一起。這種共同語言讓信仰截然不同的團體能在政治上合作，因為他們將目標定義為對抗來自國外自由主義影響、捍衛本地文化的一種方式。例如，在加納，由天主教、五旬節會和穆斯林領袖組成的聯盟成功推動了一項反 LGBTQ 法案。此外，此次行動得到了第四屆非洲跨議會會議的支持，該會議是與非洲律師公會以及美國團體 Family Watch International 共同組織的。

Historically, Islamic institutions have moved from being passive observers to active partners in this strategy. This is evident in Uganda, where inter-religious councils demanded the return of anti-homosexuality laws, and in Senegal, where the Islamic network And Sàmm Jikko Yi collaborated with the US-based group MassResistance. The main goal of these groups is to establish the African Charter on Family Values and Sovereignty, a legal document intended to create a single moral standard for the continent. However, there is a contradiction here: while the movement claims to fight Western imperialism, it uses a colonial-style method to force one set of values on a diverse population. Additionally, some Western partners in this alliance are linked to groups in their own countries that are hostile toward the same Islamic institutions they support in Africa.

在歷史上，伊斯蘭機構已從被動觀察者轉變為這項策略的積極參與者。這在烏干達十分明顯，當地的跨宗教委員會要求恢復反同性戀法例；在塞內加爾，伊斯蘭網絡 And Sàmm Jikko Yi 亦與美國團體 MassResistance 合作。這些團體的主要目標是建立《非洲家庭價值與主權憲章》，這是一份旨在為整個非洲大陸建立統一道德標準的法律文件。然而，這裡存在一個矛盾：雖然該運動聲稱反對西方帝國主義，但它卻使用一種殖民風格的方法，將一套價值觀強加於多元的人口之上。此外，此聯盟中的部分西方夥伴，在他們自己的國家中與敵視伊斯蘭機構的團體有聯繫，而他們在非洲卻支持同樣的伊斯蘭機構。

In summary, a sophisticated inter-faith political model has developed, aiming to make anti-LGBTQ laws permanent across Africa through a unified continental charter.

總結來說，一個複雜的跨信仰政治模式已經發展出來，目標是透過一份統一的大陸憲章，使反 LGBTQ 法例在全非洲永久化。

A strategic coalition comprising Christian, Muslim, and traditional religious entities is currently operating in Africa to implement restrictive legislation regarding LGBTQ rights under the guise of preserving family values.

目前在非洲有一個由基督教、伊斯蘭教和傳統宗教實體組成的戰略聯盟，以維護家庭價值為名，推行限制 LGBTQ 權利的法律。

The operationalization of this movement is characterized by a rapprochement between disparate theological factions, facilitated by the utilization of 'family values' as a secularized linguistic framework. This terminology functions as a translation protocol, permitting the political interoperability of groups with incompatible doctrines by framing their objectives as a defense of indigenous culture against global liberal influence. Evidence of this model is prominent in Ghana, where the National Coalition for Proper Human Sexual Rights and Family Values—a tripartite body including Catholic, Pentecostal, and Muslim leadership—has successfully advocated for the passage of an anti-LGBTQ bill. This legislative effort is further bolstered by the 4th African Inter-Parliamentary Conference on Family and Sovereignty in Accra, co-convened by the US-based Family Watch International and the African Bar Association.

這場運動的運作特徵在於不同神學派系之間的趨同，而「家庭價值」被用作一個世俗化的語言框架來促進這種趨同。這個詞彙扮演了翻譯協議的角色，將目標定為捍衛本土文化以對抗全球自由主義影響，使得教義不相容的團體能夠在政治上協作。這個模式在迦納非常明顯，當地由天主教會、五旬節派和伊斯蘭領袖組成的三方機構——「正當人類性權利與家庭價值國家聯盟」，成功倡導通過了一項反 LGBTQ 法案。這項立法工作進一步受到在阿克拉舉行的第四屆非洲跨議會家庭與主權會議的支持，該會議由美國的 Family Watch International 和非洲律師協會共同召集。

Historical antecedents suggest a transition in the role of Islamic institutions from passive participants to active co-architects of this strategy. This evolution is evidenced by collaborations in Uganda, where inter-religious councils demanded the return of anti-homosexuality legislation, and in Senegal, where the Islamic network And Sàmm Jikko Yi coordinated with the US-based Christian nationalist organization MassResistance. The ultimate objective of these efforts is the ratification of a proposed African Charter on Family Values and Sovereignty, a continental legal instrument intended to codify a unified moral standard. Notably, this project exhibits a paradox wherein a movement claiming to resist Western imperialism utilizes a colonial-style imposition of a singular, monolithic set of values across a diverse continent. Furthermore, some Western partners in this coalition maintain domestic affiliations with movements hostile to the very Islamic institutions they engage in Africa.

歷史先例顯示，伊斯蘭機構的角色已經從被動參與轉變為這項戰略的積極共同設計者。烏干達的跨宗教委員會要求恢復反同性戀立法，而塞內加爾的伊斯蘭網絡 And Sàmm Jikko Yi 則與美國基督教民族主義組織 MassResistance 協作，這便證明了這種演變。這些努力的最終目標是批准擬議中的《非洲家庭價值與主權憲章》，這是一個旨在將統一道德標準法典化的洲際法律工具。值得注意的是，這個項目呈現出一個悖論：一個聲稱反對西方帝國主義的運動，竟然在一個多元化的大陸上，採取殖民式地強加一套單一且僵化的價值觀。此外，這個聯盟中的部分西方合作夥伴，在各自國家內部實際上與那些敵視其在非洲所接觸的伊斯蘭機構之運動保持關聯。

The current situation is defined by the maturation of a sophisticated inter-faith political model that seeks to institutionalize anti-LGBTQ laws across the African continent through a proposed unified charter.

目前的情況在於一個複雜的跨信仰政治模式已經成熟，試圖透過擬議的統一憲章，將反 LGBTQ 法律制度化至非洲大陸各地。