People eat more meat now than in the past. This helps some poor people, but it hurts the planet.

現在人們吃肉比過去更多。這雖然幫助了一些貧困人口，但卻傷害了地球。

More people eat chicken and pork. This is bad for nature. Animals make a lot of gas that warms the earth. This gas causes climate change.

越來越多的人食用雞肉和豬肉。這對自然環境不利。動物會產生大量使地球變暖的氣體。這些氣體導致了氣候變遷。

Some scientists say people should eat more plants. But some big groups do not tell rich people to eat less meat. They want to use new technology instead.

一些科學家表示人們應該多吃植物。但一些大型組織並不要求富裕國家的人減少肉類攝取。相反地，他們希望利用新技術來解決。

Some people in rich countries now eat plant-based food. But some governments and companies want people to keep eating meat. Also, animals use too many medicines. This makes some bacteria strong and dangerous for humans.

現在一些富裕國家的人開始食用植物基食物。但部分政府和公司希望人們繼續吃肉。此外，動物使用了過多藥物，導致某些細菌變得強大，對人類造成危險。

The world makes more meat. This is bad for health and the earth. Rich countries do not want to change their diets.

世界生產了更多肉類。這對健康與地球不利。富裕國家不願改變他們的飲食習慣。

Global meat consumption has grown significantly over the last sixty years. This has created a conflict between the need for food security in developing countries and the goal of environmental sustainability in wealthier nations.

過去六十年，全球肉類消費量顯著成長。這造成了開發中國家對糧食安全的需求，與富裕國家對環境永續發展目標之間的衝突。

Data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) shows that the global meat supply has increased four times since 1961. While this growth has helped reduce malnutrition in low-income areas, it has also caused serious environmental problems. Animal farming is currently responsible for 12-20% of global greenhouse gas emissions and is a major cause of biodiversity loss. Experts predict that livestock will cause about 80% of a projected 7.6% increase in agricultural emissions over the next ten years.

聯合國糧食及農業組織（FAO）的數據顯示，自1961年以來，全球肉類供應量增加了四倍。雖然這種成長有助於減少低收入地區的營養不良問題，但同時也造成了嚴重的環境問題。畜牧業目前佔全球溫室氣體排放量的12%至20%，是生物多樣性流失的主要原因。專家預測，在未來十年中，農業排放量預計將增加7.6%，而其中約80%將由牲畜引起。

There is a clear disagreement between scientific experts and official policies. For example, the IPCC emphasizes that moving toward plant-rich diets is a critical way to reduce emissions. However, researchers from institutions like New York University have criticized the FAO for not explicitly recommending that wealthy nations eat less meat. The FAO asserts that its goal is to provide essential nutrients from animals while using new technology to lower emissions.

科學專家與官方政策之間存在明顯分歧。例如，IPCC強調，轉向以植物豐富的飲食是減少排放的關鍵方式。然而，來自紐約大學等機構的研究人員批評FAO未明確建議富裕國家減少肉類攝取。FAO則聲稱，其目標是在提供動物必需營養素的同時，利用新技術降低排放。

At the same time, a split has appeared in developed markets. In countries like Germany, plant-based alternatives and 'flexitarian' diets are becoming more popular. Nevertheless, some governments are trying to protect the meat industry. For instance, the European Union has limited how plant-based products can be named, and the US government continues to promote meat-heavy diets. Furthermore, the FAO warns that without government action, the use of antibiotics in livestock could increase by 33% over the next 15 years, raising the risk of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

與此同時，發達市場出現了分歧。在德國等國家，植物基替代品與「彈性素食」飲食變得越來越流行。儘管如此，部分政府仍試圖保護肉類產業。例如，歐盟限制了植物基產品的命名方式，而美國政府則繼續推廣高肉類飲食。此外，FAO警告，若政府不採取行動，未來15年牲畜使用抗生素的情況可能會增加33%，從而提高抗藥性細菌的風險。

The global meat supply continues to grow despite the known damage to the environment and public health. Institutional resistance is making it difficult for high-income countries to switch to plant-based diets.

儘管已知對環境與公眾健康造成損害，全球肉類供應仍持續增長。體制性的阻力使得高收入國家難以轉向植物基飲食。

Global meat consumption has increased significantly over the last six decades, creating a tension between food security in developing regions and environmental sustainability in industrialized nations.

過去六十年，全球肉類消費顯著增加，導致開發中地區的糧食安全與工業化國家的環境永續性之間產生緊張關係。

Historical data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) indicates a fourfold increase in global meat supply since 1961, with per capita poultry and pork consumption rising to 17kg and 15kg respectively by 2022. While this expansion has mitigated malnutrition in low-income jurisdictions, it has precipitated a systemic ecological burden. Animal agriculture currently accounts for 12-20% of global greenhouse gas emissions and serves as a primary driver of biodiversity loss. Projections suggest that livestock will contribute approximately 80% of a forecasted 7.6% increase in agricultural emissions over the coming decade.

聯合國糧食及農業組織 (FAO) 的歷史數據顯示，自 1961 年起全球肉類供應增加四倍，至 2022 年，人均禽類與豬肉消費量分別上升至 17 公斤與 15 公斤。雖然此擴張緩解了低收入地區的營養不良問題，但卻造成了系統性的生態負擔。動物農業目前佔全球溫室氣體排放量的 12-20%，且是生物多樣性喪失的主要驅動因素。預測顯示，在未來十年，農業排放量預計將增加 7.6%，而畜牧業將貢獻其中約 80%。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a divergence between scientific consensus and institutional policy. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) identifies a transition toward plant-rich diets as a critical demand-side mitigation strategy. Conversely, the FAO has been criticized by academic researchers, including representatives from the Stockholm Environment Institute and New York University, for omitting explicit recommendations for meat reduction in wealthy nations. The FAO maintains that its objective is the optimization of animal-source nutrients while utilizing technological innovation to attenuate emissions.

利益相關者的立場揭示了科學共識與機構政策之間的分歧。政府間氣候變化專門委員會 (IPCC) 將向植物主導飲食的轉型視為關鍵的需求端減緩策略。相反地，FAO 受到包括斯德哥爾摩環境研究所與紐約大學代表在內的學術研究人員批評，認為其未針對富裕國家明確提出減少肉類消費的建議。FAO 則主張其目標是在利用技術創新降低排放的同時，優化動物源營養。

Concurrent with these trends, a market bifurcation has emerged in developed economies. The proliferation of plant-based alternatives and the rise of 'flexitarianism'—notably in Germany—suggest a societal shift. However, this trend is countered by institutional efforts to preserve the dominance of the meat industry. Such measures include European Union legislative restrictions on the nomenclature of plant-based substitutes and the promotion of animal-heavy diets by the United States administration. Furthermore, the systemic risk of antimicrobial resistance is highlighted by FAO projections, which anticipate a nearly 33% increase in livestock antibiotic usage over the next 15 years absent state intervention.

與這些趨勢同時，發達經濟體中出現了市場分叉現象。植物基替代品的普及與「彈性素食主義」的興起（尤其在德國）顯示出社會轉向。然而，這一趨勢受到旨在維持肉類工業主導地位之機構努力的抵制。此類措施包括歐盟對植物基替代品命名方式的立法限制，以及美國政府對高肉類飲食的推廣。此外，FAO 的預測凸顯了抗生素耐藥性的系統性風險，預計若無政府干預，未來 15 年畜牧業的抗生素使用量將增加近 33%。

Global meat supply continues to expand despite documented environmental degradation and public health risks, with institutional resistance hindering the adoption of plant-based dietary shifts in high-income countries.

儘管環境惡化與公共衛生風險已成事實，全球肉類供應仍持續擴張，且機構的阻力阻礙了高收入國家採納植物基飲食轉型。