Varsha Gohil and Bhadresh Gohil fought about money for twenty-three years. Now, a court in the UK has made a final decision.

Varsha Gohil 與 Bhadresh Gohil 為了金錢爭執了二十三年。現在英國法院已做出最終決定。

Varsha asked for a divorce in 2002. Later, the court found that Bhadresh hid money. In 2010, Bhadresh went to prison for ten years. He stole money and lied about it.

Varsha 在 2002 年要求離婚。隨後，法院發現 Bhadresh 隱瞞了財產。在 2010 年，Bhadresh 因偷竊金錢並對此撒謊而被判處十年監禁。

In 2015, the Supreme Court said a person can ask for more money if their partner lied about their wealth. The court looked at 28 million pounds. The government wanted all the money because it was from crimes.

在 2015 年，最高法院表示，如果伴侶對其財富撒謊，當事人可以要求更多金錢。法院審視了 2800 萬英鎊。政府希望沒收所有款項，因為這些是犯罪所得。

But the judge found some money was legal. The judge said Bhadresh was very dishonest. The judge gave 6.66 million pounds to Varsha. Last month, the court said this is the final answer.

但法官發現部分金錢是合法的。法官表示 Bhadresh 非常不誠實。法官判給 Varsha 666 萬英鎊。上個月，法院表示這是最終裁定。

The court stopped the fight. Varsha Gohil will get 6.6 million pounds.

法院終結了這場爭端。Varsha Gohil 將獲得 666 萬英鎊。

A legal battle lasting twenty-three years over the division of marital assets between Varsha Gohil and Bhadresh Gohil has finally ended in the United Kingdom.

一場關於 Varsha Gohil 與 Bhadresh Gohil 分割婚姻資產、持續 23 年的法律戰，終於在英國落幕。

The legal process began in May 2002 after Varsha Gohil filed for divorce. Although the couple initially reached an agreement, the discovery of hidden assets caused the court to reconsider the financial split. The case became very complex because it involved both family law and criminal law. In 2010, Bhadresh Gohil, a lawyer, was sentenced to ten years in prison after being convicted of money laundering, forgery, and fraud related to a client in Nigeria.

法律程序始於 2002 年 5 月 Varsha Gohil 提出離婚申請。雖然夫妻倆最初達成了協議，但由於發現隱藏資產，導致法院決定重新審視財務分配。由於此案同時涉及家庭法與刑事法，因此變得非常複雜。2010 年，身為律師的 Bhadresh Gohil 因被裁定涉及一名奈及利亞客戶的洗錢、偽造及欺詐罪，被判處 10 年監禁。

A major turning point happened in 2015 when the UK Supreme Court ruled that if a spouse hides financial information, the settlement can be reopened. This allowed the court to examine about £28 million in assets. However, a conflict arose because the Crown Prosecution Service wanted to seize all the money as criminal proceeds, whereas Varsha Gohil argued that some of the wealth came from legal business activities during the marriage.

2015 年出現了一個重大轉折點，當時英國最高法院裁定，若配偶隱瞞財務資訊，結算協議可以重新開啟。這使得法院得以審查約 2,800 萬英鎊的資產。然而，隨後產生了衝突，因為英國皇家檢控署希望將所有資金作為犯罪所得沒收，而 Varsha Gohil 則主張部分財富源自婚姻期間合法的商業活動。

After reviewing the evidence, the High Court decided that about 23.82% of the funds were legal. Consequently, Justice Williams awarded £6.66 million to Varsha Gohil and described Bhadresh Gohil's behavior as extremely dishonest. The case officially ended last month when the Court of Appeal refused to hear any further requests for review.

在審查證據後，高等法院判定約 23.82% 的資金為合法。因此，Williams 法官判給 Varsha Gohil 666 萬英鎊，並形容 Bhadresh Gohil 的行為極其不誠實。上個月，上訴法院拒絕受理任何進一步的覆核請求，此案正式結案。

The UK Court of Appeal has stopped all further legal action, confirming that Varsha Gohil will receive a settlement of £6.6 million.

英國上訴法院已停止所有進一步的法律行動，確認 Varsha Gohil 將獲得 660 萬英鎊的結算金。

A legal conflict spanning twenty-three years regarding the division of marital assets between Varsha Gohil and Bhadresh Gohil has reached a definitive conclusion in the United Kingdom.

一宗關於 Varsha Gohil 與 Bhadresh Gohil 之間分割婚姻資產、持續 23 年的法律衝突，在英國已達到最終結論。

The litigation commenced in May 2002, following a petition for divorce filed by Varsha Gohil. Although an initial settlement was reached, the subsequent emergence of undisclosed assets prompted a reconsideration of the financial distribution. The proceedings were significantly complicated by the intersection of civil matrimonial law and criminal jurisprudence. In 2010, Bhadresh Gohil, a legal professional, was convicted of money laundering, forgery, and conspiracy to defraud in connection with a Nigerian client, resulting in a ten-year custodial sentence.

此訴訟始於 2002 年 5 月，由 Varsha Gohil 提起離婚申請。雖然最初達成了協議，但隨後出現未披露的資產，導致財務分配需重新考慮。由於民事婚姻法與刑事法理的交織，使訴訟程序變得極為複雜。2010 年，法律專業人士 Bhadresh Gohil 因涉及一名奈及利亞客戶的洗錢、偽造文書及串謀詐騙被定罪，被判處十年監禁。

A critical legal juncture occurred in 2015 when the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom determined that the failure of a spouse to provide full financial disclosure constitutes grounds for the reopening of a settlement. This ruling facilitated the scrutiny of approximately £28 million in assets. A jurisdictional conflict emerged between the Crown Prosecution Service, which sought the total confiscation of these funds as proceeds of crime, and the petitioner, who asserted that a portion of the wealth was derived from legitimate business activities conducted during the marriage.

2015 年出現了一個關鍵的法律轉折點，英國最高法院裁定，配偶未能提供完整的財務披露，即構成重新開啟結算協議的理由。此裁決促使約 2,800 萬英鎊的資產受到審查。隨後在皇家檢察署與申請人之間出現管轄權衝突，前者要求將這些資金全數沒收，視為犯罪所得；而申請人則主張部分財富源於婚姻期間經營的合法商業活動。

Upon review, the High Court determined that a subset of the assets—approximately 23.82% of the total realisable funds—was untainted. Justice Williams subsequently awarded £6.66 million to Varsha Gohil. The judiciary characterized the respondent's conduct as exhibiting an extreme degree of dishonesty. The finality of this judgment was ensured last month when the Court of Appeal denied further petitions for review, thereby terminating the protracted legal trajectory of the case.

經審理，高等法院認定部分資產（約佔總可實現資金的 23.82%）未受污染。Williams 法官隨後判給 Varsha Gohil 666 萬英鎊。法院將答辯人的行為定性為表現出極端的不誠實。上個月，上訴法院駁回了進一步的覆核申請，確保了此判決的終局性，從而終結了本案漫長的法律進程。

The UK Court of Appeal has precluded further litigation, confirming a settlement of £6.6 million for Varsha Gohil.

英國上訴法院已排除進一步訴訟，確認 Varsha Gohil 獲得 660 萬英鎊的結算金額。