Two accidents happened in Surat and Ludhiana. Workers breathed bad gas while cleaning tanks. Many people died.

在蘇拉特與盧底亞納發生了兩起意外。工人在清理水槽時吸入了有毒氣體，導致多人死亡。

In Surat, four people died at a jewelry factory. They cleaned a waste tank. They did not have safety masks. The police are watching videos to find the truth.

在蘇拉特，一家珠寶廠有四人死亡。他們當時在清理一個廢物槽，但沒有配戴安全口罩。警方目前正在查看影片以查明真相。

In Ludhiana, three people died at a tool factory on June 1. Two other workers went to the hospital. They cleaned a tank without safety tools.

在盧底亞納，6月1日一家工具廠有三人死亡。另外兩名工人被送往醫院。他們在沒有安全工具的情況下清理水槽。

A human rights group is now angry. They say this is a crime. They want a report from the police in fourteen days. The factory owner is in trouble with the law.

一個人權組織目前感到憤怒。他們表示這是一場犯罪，要求警方在十四天內提交報告。工廠主目前面臨法律制裁。

These accidents show that factories are not safe. People died because the companies did not follow safety rules.

這些事故表明工廠並不安全。由於公司未遵守安全規範，導致人員死亡。

Two separate industrial accidents in Surat and Ludhiana led to several deaths and injuries. In both cases, workers inhaled dangerous fumes while cleaning chemical waste tanks.

蘇拉特與盧迪亞納發生兩起獨立的工業事故，導致多人死亡與受傷。在這兩起案例中，工人在清洗化學廢物儲罐時吸入了危險煙霧。

In Surat, Gujarat, four people—including one supervisor and three workers—died at a jewelry factory. They were cleaning a waste tank during a regular maintenance task when they were overcome by poisonous gases. Local police emphasized that the workers did not have the necessary protective equipment, which suggests a failure to follow safety rules. Consequently, the Deputy Commissioner of Police is now reviewing CCTV footage to determine who is responsible for this negligence.

在古吉拉特邦的蘇拉特，一家珠寶廠有四人死亡，包括一名主管與三名工人。他們在進行定期維修工作清洗廢物儲罐時，被有毒氣體侵害而死亡。當地警方強調，工人們沒有配備必要的防護設備，這顯示出未能遵守安全規範。因此，警察副專員目前正在審查 CCTV 監視畫面，以確定誰應對此疏忽負責。

Similarly, in Ludhiana, Punjab, a chemical tank at a hand tools factory caused three deaths and two injuries on June 1. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has stepped in, asserting that the lack of safety gear during the cleaning process may be a human rights violation. Furthermore, the NHRC has ordered the Punjab chief secretary and the Ludhiana police to submit a full report within fourteen days. Although the factory owner has been charged with a serious crime, no one has been arrested yet.

同樣地，在旁遮普邦的盧迪亞納，6月1日一家手工具廠的化學儲罐導致三人死亡與兩人受傷。國家人權委員會（NHRC）已介入，聲稱清洗過程缺乏安全裝備可能是一種侵犯人權的行為。此外，NHRC 已命令旁遮普邦首席秘書與盧迪亞納警方在十四日之內提交一份完整報告。儘管工廠老闆已被指控犯下嚴重罪行，但目前尚未有人被逮捕。

Both incidents highlight a serious failure to implement industrial safety measures, resulting in tragic loss of life and ongoing legal investigations.

這兩起事故均凸顯了在執行工業安全措施方面的嚴重缺失，導致悲劇性的生命損失，且法律調查仍在進行中。

Two separate industrial incidents in Surat and Ludhiana resulted in multiple fatalities and injuries due to the inhalation of hazardous fumes during the cleaning of chemical waste repositories.

在蘇拉特與盧底亞納發生的兩起獨立工業事故中，由於在清理化學廢物儲存槽時吸入危險煙霧，導致多人死亡與受傷。

In Surat, Gujarat, a fatality event occurred at a jewelry manufacturing facility involving a septic tank utilized for the collection of cleaning process waste. The incident involved four individuals—one supervisor and three laborers—who succumbed to poisonous gases during a scheduled bimonthly maintenance operation. Preliminary police assessments indicate a failure to adhere to established safety protocols, noting a critical absence of protective equipment despite the supervisor's prior notification to the fire department. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-1, has initiated a forensic analysis of CCTV footage to determine the discrepancy between mandated safety standards and actual implementation to establish institutional liability.

在古吉拉特邦的蘇拉特，一家珠寶製造廠發生了一起死亡事故，涉及一個用於收集清潔過程廢物的化糞池。該事故涉及四名人員——一名主管與三名工人——他們在一次每兩個月一次的定期維護工作中，因吸入有毒氣體而喪生。警方初步評估指出，事故原因在於未能遵守既定的安全協定，並注意到儘管主管先前已通知消防局，但現場仍嚴重缺乏防護設備。第一區警察副局長已啟動對監視器（CCTV）片段的鑑識分析，以確定法定安全標準與實際執行之間的落差，從而建立機構責任。

Parallelly, in Ludhiana, Punjab, a chemical disposal tank at a hand tools factory became the site of a similar occurrence on June 1. This event resulted in three fatalities and the hospitalization of two additional workers. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has intervened suo motu, characterizing the lack of safety apparatus during the manual cleaning of the sewage system as a potential human rights violation. Consequently, the NHRC has mandated that the Punjab chief secretary and the Ludhiana police commissioner provide a comprehensive report within a fourteen-day window, encompassing the status of the investigation and the provision of compensatory measures. While an FIR has been registered against the factory owner under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, no custodial arrests have been executed to date.

與此同時，在旁遮普邦的盧底亞納，一家手工具廠的化學廢物處理槽於6月1日發生了類似事件。此次事件導致三人死亡，另有兩名工人住院。國家人權委員會（NHRC）已主動介入，將人工清理污水系統時缺乏安全設備的行為定性為潛在的人權侵害。因此，NHRC 要求旁遮普邦首席秘書與盧底亞納警察局長在十四天內提供一份綜合報告，涵蓋調查進度與補償措施。雖然警方已根據《印度法典》（Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita）第105條（非謀殺之過失致死）對工廠老闆登記首案報告（FIR），但至今尚未執行羈押逮捕。

Both cases underscore a systemic failure in the application of industrial safety measures, leading to significant loss of life and subsequent legal and human rights inquiries.

這兩起案件均凸顯了工業安全措施在應用上的系統性失效，導致嚴重的人命損失，並隨後引發法律與人權調查。