Courts in Singapore finished two cases. One case was about stolen money. The other case was about fake work papers.

新加坡法院審理完畢兩起案件。一起關於盜取金錢，另一起關於偽造工作文件。

Yeong Poh Chin moved S$37,000 from a scam. She got S$5,000 for this. Her lawyer said she is a slow learner. The judge did not agree. He said she is not mentally ill.

Yeong Poh Chin 幫忙轉移了 37,000 新加坡元的詐騙款項。她因此獲得 5,000 新加坡元。她的律師稱她學習能力較慢。但法官並不認同，表示她並沒有精神疾病。

Wang Jue helped people get work visas. She used fake jobs to do this. One person paid her S$360,000. This person did not actually work. The judge said the investment was a lie.

Wang Jue 協助他人申請工作簽證，她利用虛假職位來達成目的。有人支付了 360,000 新加坡元給她，而該人實際上並未工作。法官表示這項投資是一個謊言。

Wang Jue told the court about a man named Wang Wei. The judge did not believe her. He said her story was not true.

Wang Jue 向法院提到一名叫 Wang Wei 的男子。法官並不相信她，表示她的說法並非事實。

Yeong Poh Chin must go to prison for 17 months and two weeks. Wang Jue is waiting for her punishment.

Yeong Poh Chin 必須入獄 17 個月又兩週。Wang Jue 則在等待判刑。

The Singaporean courts have recently dealt with two separate cases involving the illegal movement of money and the fraudulent attempt to get residency permits.

新加坡法院最近處理了兩起獨立案件，涉及非法轉移資金以及企圖透過欺詐手段獲取居留許可。

In the first case, the court looked at the crimes of Yeong Poh Chin, a 59-year-old citizen who helped move S$37,000 from scams through several bank accounts. In return, she received S$5,000. Her lawyers asked for a shorter sentence, arguing that psychiatric reports described her as a 'slow learner' with a dependent personality. They claimed she could not fully understand the concept of money laundering. However, District Judge Samuel Wee rejected these arguments, stating that these personality traits are not recognized as legal mental illnesses. Furthermore, the judge noted that there was no clear link between her personality and the crimes she committed.

在第一起案件中，法院審理了 59 歲公民 Yeong Poh Chin 的罪行，她協助將 37,000 新加坡元的詐騙款項透過多個銀行帳戶轉移，作為回報，她收到了 5,000 新加坡元。她的律師請求減刑，理由是精神科報告將其描述為一名「學習緩慢」且具有依賴型人格的人。他們聲稱她無法完全理解洗錢的概念。然而，地區法官 Samuel Wee 拒絕了這些論點，指出這些人格特質並不被視為法律上的精神疾病。此外，法官指出她的人格與所犯下的罪行之間沒有明確的關聯。

At the same time, the court examined a complex immigration scheme run by Wang Jue. The prosecution proved that Wang created fake employment arrangements to help foreigners get employment passes, which they then used to apply for permanent residency. For example, a Chinese national paid S$360,000 to Wang's account, claiming it was an investment in a company called MW Dynamics. In reality, no work was ever done. District Judge Tan Jen Tse concluded that the investment was a fake agreement designed only to get the residency pass. Although Wang claimed she was a legitimate consultant for wealthy entrepreneurs, the court found her testimony to be unreliable.

與此同時，法院審查了由 Wang Jue 經營的一個複雜移民計劃。控方證明 Wang 創造了虛假的就業安排以幫助外國人獲取就業准證，隨後他們利用這些准證申請永久居留權。例如，一名中國國民向 Wang 的帳戶支付了 360,000 新加坡元，聲稱是對一家名為 MW Dynamics 公司的投資。實際上，該公司並未進行任何工作。地區法官 Tan Jen Tse 認定該項投資僅僅是為了獲取居留准證而設計的虛假協議。儘管 Wang 聲稱自己是富裕企業家的合法顧問，但法院認為她的證詞不可信。

Yeong Poh Chin has been sentenced to 17 months and two weeks in prison and has filed an appeal. Meanwhile, Wang Jue is waiting to be sentenced for conspiracy to make false declarations.

Yeong Poh Chin 被判處 17 個月零兩週監禁，並已提起上訴。與此同時，Wang Jue 正在等待共謀作出虛假申報的判刑。

The Singaporean judiciary has recently presided over two distinct cases involving the illicit movement of funds and the fraudulent acquisition of residency permits.

新加坡司法機關最近審理了兩起不同的案件，涉及非法轉移資金與透過欺詐手段獲取居留許可。

In the first instance, the court addressed the culpability of Yeong Poh Chin, a 59-year-old national who facilitated the transfer of S$37,000 in scam proceeds across multiple bank accounts for a remuneration of S$5,000. The defense sought a reduction in sentencing by citing psychiatric evaluations that characterized the defendant as a 'slow learner' with a concrete cognitive style and a dependent personality, specifically regarding male figures. These reports suggested a diminished capacity to comprehend abstract concepts such as money laundering. However, District Judge Samuel Wee dismissed these assertions, noting that the described traits did not constitute legally recognized mental conditions. Furthermore, the court found a lack of causal linkage between the defendant's personality traits and the commission of the offenses, observing contradictions between the psychiatric reports regarding the defendant's insight into her actions.

在第一起案件中，法院審理了 59 歲國民 Yeong Poh Chin 的責任。她協助將 37,000 新加坡元（S$）的詐騙所得轉至多個銀行帳戶，並獲得 5,000 新加坡元的報酬。辯方引用精神科評估要求減刑，將被告描述為一名「學習緩慢」、認知風格單一且具有依賴型人格（特別是對男性）的人。這些報告建議其理解洗錢等抽象概念的能力較低。然而，地方法官 Samuel Wee 駁回了這些主張，指出上述特質並不構成法律認可的精神疾病。此外，法院發現被告的人格特質與犯罪行為之間缺乏因果聯繫，並觀察到精神科報告中關於被告對其行為之認知存在矛盾。

Parallelly, the judiciary examined a sophisticated immigration scheme orchestrated by Wang Jue. The prosecution established that Wang facilitated sham employment arrangements to enable foreign nationals to obtain employment passes as a precursor to permanent residency. In one specific case, a Chinese national transferred S$360,000 to Wang's account under the guise of an investment in MW Dynamics. This arrangement provided the individual with an employment pass despite the absence of any actual labor performed. District Judge Tan Jen Tse determined that the investment agreement was a sham, concluding that the primary objective was the acquisition of the pass. While the defense characterized Wang as a legitimate intermediary for high-net-worth entrepreneurs, the court found her testimony regarding a fictitious associate, 'Wang Wei,' to be unreliable.

與此同時，司法機關調查了一項由 Wang Jue 策劃的複雜移民計劃。檢方證實 Wang 促成虛假就業安排，使外籍人士能獲取就業准證，作為申請永久居留權的前奏。在其中一個特定案例中，一名中國國民以投資 MW Dynamics 為名，將 360,000 新加坡元轉至 Wang 的帳戶。此安排使該人士在沒有實際工作的情況下獲得了就業准證。地方法官 Tan Jen Tse 認定該投資協議為虛假，結論是其主要目的是為了獲取准證。儘管辯方將 Wang 描述為高淨值企業家的合法中介，但法院發現她關於一名虛構合夥人「Wang Wei」的證詞不可信。

Yeong Poh Chin has been sentenced to 17 months and two weeks of imprisonment and has filed an appeal, while Wang Jue awaits sentencing for conspiracy to make false declarations.

Yeong Poh Chin 被判處 17 個月零兩週監禁並已提起上訴；而 Wang Jue 則在等待共謀作出虛假申報的判刑。