A judge in Cairns says a famous man's name must stay secret in a court case about money and threats.

一名凱恩斯法官表示，在一個涉及金錢與恐嚇的案件中，一名名人的姓名必須保持秘密。

A man is in trouble. He stole information from a laptop. He found out a woman had a secret relationship with a famous man. He told the woman he would tell everyone if she gave him $15,000.

一名男子陷入了麻煩。他從一台筆記型電腦中盜取了資訊。他發現一名女子與一名名人有秘密關係。他告訴該女子，如果她給他 15,000 美元，他就不會將此事告知所有人。

News companies wanted to tell the famous man's name. They said the judge should not protect him. They said the man just wanted to avoid feeling embarrassed.

新聞公司希望能公布該名人的姓名。他們認為法官不應該保護他，並表示該男子只是想避免感到尷尬。

Judge Gelma Meoli said no. She said the name must stay secret. If the court tells the name, the bad man wins. The judge wants victims to feel safe when they go to court.

法官 Gelma Meoli 否決了此要求。她表示姓名必須保持秘密。如果法院公布姓名，那個惡行的人就贏了。法官希望受害者在出庭時能感到安全。

The name is still a secret. The court will meet again on July 28.

姓名仍然保密。法院將於 7 月 28 日再次開庭。

A magistrate in Cairns has decided to keep a non-publication order in place to protect the identity of a well-known man mentioned in an extortion case.

凱恩斯的一名地方法官決定維持非公開命令，以保護一起勒索案中提到的一名知名人士的身份。

The legal case involves a man accused of trying to extort money from a former partner. The prosecution claims that the defendant accessed a laptop without permission and found evidence of a secret relationship between the victim and a prominent Queensland man. The defendant allegedly used this information to threaten the victim with public exposure and financial loss, specifically demanding $15,000 related to a property settlement. Additionally, it is claimed that a second threat was made against another person connected to the victim.

此法律案件涉及一名被指控試圖向前伴侶勒索金錢的男子。檢方聲稱，被告在未經許可的情況下進入一部筆記型電腦，發現了被害者與一名昆士蘭知名人士之間存在秘密關係的證據。被告據稱利用此資訊威脅被害者，稱將公開此事並導致其面臨財務損失，特別是要求一筆與財產分割相關的 15,000 美元。此外，據稱被告還對另一名與被害者相關的人士發出了第二次威脅。

Lawyers for several media companies challenged this order, arguing that the court's power should only be used to protect the victim. They emphasized that the identity of the famous man is not directly linked to the victim's anonymity. Furthermore, they suggested that the order was designed to avoid embarrassment for the high-profile individual rather than to meet a legal necessity. They also argued that because the man did not seek a separate privacy order from the Supreme Court, he had given up his right to privacy.

幾家媒體公司的律師對此命令提出質疑，認為法院的權力應僅用於保護被害者。他們強調，該名知名人士的身份與被害者的匿名性沒有直接關聯。此外，他們暗示該命令旨在避免高知名度人士感到尷尬，而非出於法律必要。他們還主張，由於該男子未向最高法院申請獨立的隱私令，因此他已放棄其隱私權。

However, Magistrate Gelma Meoli rejected these arguments, stating that the order is necessary for the fair administration of justice. The court explained that revealing the man's identity would actually help the defendant achieve his goal of extortion through the legal process. The magistrate clarified that the decision was not based on the man's social status, but on the need to ensure that victims of extortion feel safe enough to report crimes. Consequently, the court was closed to the general public, allowing only accredited media to attend.

然而，地方法官 Gelma Meoli 駁回了這些論點，表示該命令對於公平執行司法是必要的。法院解釋，揭露該男子的身份實際上會幫助被告透過法律程序達成勒索目的。法官澄清，此決定並非基於該男子的社會地位，而是為了確保勒索被害者有足夠的安全感來舉報犯罪。因此，法院禁止一般大眾進入，僅允許獲認證的媒體出席。

The non-publication order remains active, and the case is scheduled for another hearing on July 28.

非公開命令維持有效，案件預計將於 7 月 28 日再次開庭。

A Cairns magistrate has upheld a non-publication order to protect the identity of a high-profile individual mentioned in an extortion case.

一名凱恩斯地方法官維持了一項不公開令，以保護一名在勒索案中被提及的高知名度人士的身份。

The legal proceedings concern an accused male who allegedly attempted to extort a former partner. The prosecution asserts that the defendant obtained evidence of an extramarital liaison between the complainant and a prominent Queensland male via unauthorized access to a laptop. This information was purportedly utilized to threaten the complainant with public exposure and financial detriment, specifically regarding a property settlement shortfall of $15,000. Furthermore, a secondary threat was allegedly directed toward a third party associated with the complainant.

此次法律訴訟涉及一名被指控企圖勒索前伴侶的男性。檢方主張，被告透過非法存取一台筆記型電腦，獲取了原告與一名昆士蘭著名男性之間婚外情的證據。據稱，這些資訊被用來威脅原告將其公開並造成財務損失，特別是關於 15,000 澳元的財產分割差額。此外，據稱被告還向一名與原告相關的第三方發出了第二個威脅。

Legal representatives for various media organizations, led by Andrew O'Brien KC, challenged the suppression order. The media's position was predicated on the assertion that the magistrate's jurisdiction is limited to the protection of the complainant and that the identity of the high-profile male is not inextricably linked to the complainant's anonymity. Counsel further posited that the selective suppression of the prominent individual, as opposed to the other threatened party, suggested a motivation rooted in the avoidance of embarrassment rather than legal necessity. It was argued that the individual in question had failed to seek a separate injunction from the Supreme Court, thereby waiving a claim to privacy.

由 Andrew O'Brien KC 領頭的多家媒體機構法律代表對該禁制令提出挑戰。媒體的立場是基於此主張：地方法官的管轄權僅限於保護原告，而該高知名度男性的身份與原告的匿名性並非不可分割。法律顧問進一步認為，選擇性地隱瞞著名人士而非另一名被威脅方，顯示其動機在於避免尷尬而非法律必要。他們主張，該人士未能向最高法院尋求獨立禁制令，因此放棄了對隱私權的請求。

Magistrate Gelma Meoli rejected these submissions, maintaining that the non-publication order is essential for the proper administration of justice. The court reasoned that the disclosure of the high-profile man's identity would effectively facilitate the defendant's extortionate objective through the judicial process. The magistrate clarified that the order is not predicated on the individual's social standing but on the necessity of ensuring that victims of extortion feel sufficiently protected to initiate legal complaints. Consequently, the court was closed to the general public, permitting only accredited media presence.

地方法官 Gelma Meoli 駁回了這些申請，堅持不公開令對於司法公正的執行至關重要。法院認定，披露該高知名度男性的身份將實際上透過司法程序促成被告的勒索目的。法官澄清，該命令並非基於該人士的社會地位，而是基於確保勒索受害者感受到足夠的保護，以便啟動法律投訴。因此，法庭禁止一般公眾進入，僅允許持有認證的媒體出席。

The non-publication order remains in effect, and the matter is scheduled for further hearing on July 28.

不公開令維持有效，案件定於 7 月 28 日再次審理。