People found a secret recording device in a government building in London.

人們在倫敦的一棟政府大樓中發現了一個秘密錄音設備。

The device was in the ceiling of a common room. It was there for two months. It was not in the offices of the leaders.

該設備位於公共休息室的天花板上。它在那裡放置了兩個月。它並不在領導人的辦公室內。

Government offices do not want to talk about this. They say they cannot give details about security. Security services now know about the device.

政府部門不願討論此事。他們表示無法提供關於安全細節的資訊。安全部門目前已得知該設備的存在。

One politician, Alex Burghart, says this is a big problem. He wants to know who put the device there. He wants to know if the device stole secret information.

一位政治家 Alex Burghart 表示這是一個嚴重的問題。他想知道是誰將設備放置在那裡。他想知道該設備是否竊取了機密資訊。

Security services are checking the building. The government is staying silent.

安全部門正在檢查大樓。政府則保持沉默。

A hidden electronic recording device was discovered inside a government building on Marsham Street, which is used by both the Home Office and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).

在 Marsham Street 一棟由內政部與房屋、社區及地方政府部 (MHCLG) 共同使用的政府大樓內，發現了一個隱藏的電子錄音裝置。

The device was found in a ceiling panel in a common area of the building within the last two months. Although the facility is the headquarters for the Home Office—which is responsible for national security—and the MHCLG, the device was located away from the main ministerial offices. Specifically, reports suggest it was found in the section used by the MHCLG, a department that previously handled planning permissions for the Chinese embassy in London.

該裝置是在過去兩個月內，於大樓公共區域的天花板面板中發現的。雖然該設施是負責國家安全的內政部與 MHCLG 的總部，但該裝置的位置遠離主要部長辦公室。具體而言，報告指出它被發現於 MHCLG 使用的區域，而該部門先前處理過倫敦中國大使館的規劃許可證。

Government officials have provided very little information. A spokesperson for the MHCLG refused to give details, stating that they do not comment on security procedures. Similarly, the Home Office and the Prime Minister's office declined to give further information. However, security services have been informed of the breach. While the building is strategically important, current reports emphasize that there is no evidence linking the device to Russian or Chinese intelligence agents.

政府官員提供的資訊非常有限。MHCLG 的發言人拒絕提供詳情，表示他們不會對安全程序發表評論。同樣地，內政部與首相辦公室也拒絕提供進一步資訊。然而，安全部門已獲知此次漏洞。儘管該大樓具有戰略重要性，但目前的報告強調，沒有證據顯示該裝置與俄羅斯或中國的情報人員有關。

Regarding government oversight, Alex Burghart, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, described the event as a serious incident. Mr. Burghart asserted that an urgent investigation is necessary to identify who was responsible, how long the device was active, and whether any sensitive data was stolen. Furthermore, he suggested that this incident raises important questions about the overall security of government buildings.

關於政府監督，蘭開斯特公國影子大臣 Alex Burghart 將此次事件描述為嚴重事故。Burghart 先生主張有必要進行緊急調查，以確定責任人、裝置運作了多久，以及是否有敏感數據被盜。此外，他認為此次事件對政府大樓的整體安全提出了重要質疑。

Security services are now aware of the breach, while government departments continue to refuse to provide details about the ongoing situation.

安全部門目前已獲知此次漏洞，而政府部門則繼續拒絕提供關於目前情況的詳情。

A concealed electronic recording device was identified within a government complex on Marsham Street, housing both the Home Office and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).

在 Marsham Street 的一座政府綜合大樓內發現了一個隱蔽的電子錄音設備，該大樓由內政部與房屋、社區及地方政府部 (MHCLG) 共用。

The device was located within a ceiling panel in a communal area of the facility during the preceding two-month period. While the building serves as the operational base for the Home Office—the entity tasked with national security and policing—and the MHCLG, the apparatus was situated away from ministerial offices. Specifically, sources indicate the discovery occurred within the section of the complex allocated to the MHCLG, a department previously involved in the adjudication of planning permissions for the Chinese embassy in London.

該設備在過去兩個月期間，被發現位於設施公共區域的天花板面板內。雖然該建築是內政部（負責國家安全與警務的單位）及 MHCLG 的運作基地，但該設備設置在遠離部長辦公室的位置。具體而言，消息來源指出，發現地點位於分配給 MHCLG 的區域，該部門此前曾參與審理中國駐倫敦大使館的規劃許可。

Institutional responses have remained constrained. A spokesperson for the MHCLG declined to provide specifics, citing a policy of non-commentary regarding security protocols. Similarly, the Home Office and the Prime Minister's spokesperson abstained from further elaboration. Notwithstanding these official silences, security services have been notified of the breach. Although the facility's strategic importance is noted, current reports indicate an absence of evidence linking the installation of the device to Russian or Chinese intelligence operatives.

機構的回應仍然相當克制。MHCLG 的發言人以不評論安全協定的政策為由，拒絕提供細節。同樣地，內政部與首相的發言人也拒絕進一步說明。儘管官方保持沉默，但安全部門已獲通知此次入侵事件。雖然該設施的戰略重要性已被注意到，但目前的報告顯示，尚無證據將設備的安裝與俄羅斯或中國的情報人員聯繫起來。

From a legislative oversight perspective, Alex Burghart, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, has characterized the event as a serious incident. Mr. Burghart posited that the breach necessitates an urgent inquiry to determine the identity of the responsible party, the duration of the device's operation, and the extent to which classified or sensitive data may have been compromised. He further suggested that the incident raises fundamental questions regarding the integrity of governmental security infrastructure.

從立法監督的角度來看，蘭開斯特公領影子大臣 Alex Burghart 將此次事件定性為嚴重事件。Burghart 先生認為，此次入侵需要緊急調查，以確定責任方身分、設備的運作時間，以及機密或敏感數據可能被洩露的程度。他進而指出，此次事件對政府安全基礎設施的完整性提出了根本性的質疑。

Security services are currently informed of the breach, while government departments maintain a policy of non-disclosure regarding the ongoing situation.

安全部門目前已獲通知此次入侵，而政府部門對當前情況維持不披露政策。