The Canadian government wants to change a new law. This law is about how long phone and internet companies keep user data.

加拿大政府想要修改一項新法律。這項法律是關於電話與網路公司需要保存用戶數據的時間長短。

The law has two parts. Part 1 helps police find people quickly. Most people like this part. Part 2 says companies must save data about where people are and who they call.

這項法律分為兩個部分。第一部分旨在幫助警方快速找到人，大多數人都支持這部分。第二部分則規定公司必須保存關於用戶位置以及通話對象的數據。

Some teachers say saving data for one year is too long. They think the government can watch too many people. Now, Minister Gary Anandasangaree wants to save data for less than one year. Maybe six months.

一些教師認為保存一年的數據時間太長。他們認為政府可能會監控太多人。現在，部長 Gary Anandasangaree 想要將數據保存時間縮短至一年以下，或許是六個月。

The Conservative party wants to pass Part 1 now and talk about Part 2 later. But the government says no. They want to keep the law together to stop crime.

保守黨希望現在先通過第一部分，稍後再討論第二部分。但政府表示不同意。他們希望將這項法律保持完整，以有效打擊犯罪。

The government will show these new changes to a committee soon.

政府很快將會將這些新變更提交給委員會。

The Canadian government has shown that it is willing to reduce the amount of time that electronic service providers must keep digital metadata under a new proposed law.

加拿大政府表示，在新擬議的法律下，他們願意縮短電子服務供應商必須保存數位元數據的時間。

The proposed law, Bill C-22, is divided into two main parts. Part 1 allows authorities to quickly check if specific people or phone numbers are using certain telecommunications services, a section that most people agree with. In contrast, Part 2 requires providers to keep technical systems that help the police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service collect data, including information about where a user is located and who they are communicating with.

這項擬議的法律（C-22 法案）分為兩個主要部分。第一部分允許當局快速檢查特定人士或電話號碼是否使用某些電信服務，這部分大多數人都表示同意。相反地，第二部分要求供應商維持一套技術系統，以協助警方和加拿大安全情報局收集數據，包括用戶的位置以及通訊對象。

There has been significant disagreement regarding the original plan to store this data for one year. Experts from the University of Ottawa emphasized that such a long period could allow the government to create detailed surveillance maps of the general public. Consequently, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has changed his position; he is now open to shortening this timeframe to somewhere between six months and one year. Furthermore, the government plans to add amendments to ensure that data encryption standards are not weakened.

關於原計劃將數據儲存一年的方案，存在顯著分歧。渥太華大學的專家強調，如此長的期限可能會讓政府能夠建立一份針對一般大眾的詳細監控地圖。因此，公共安全部長 Gary Anandasangaree 改變了立場；他現在對將此期限縮短至六個月到一年之間持開放態度。此外，政府計劃加入修正案，以確保數據加密標準不會被削弱。

Different political groups remain divided on the issue. The Conservative party suggested splitting the bill into two, allowing Part 1 to pass immediately while Part 2 is studied more closely. However, the government has rejected this idea. They asserted that the legislation must stay together to ensure law enforcement has the modern tools needed to fight crime while still respecting the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

不同的政治團體對此問題仍持有分歧。保守黨建議將法案拆分為兩部分，允許第一部分立即通過，而第二部分則進行更詳細的研究。然而，政府拒絕了這個想法。他們堅稱該立法必須保持完整，以確保執法部門擁有打擊犯罪所需的現代化工具，同時依然尊重《權利與自由憲章》。

The government is now preparing to present these updated storage periods and encryption details to the House of Commons public safety committee.

政府目前正準備將這些更新後的儲存期限與加密詳情提交給國會下議院的公共安全委員會。

The Canadian government has indicated a willingness to reduce the duration for which electronic service providers must retain digital metadata under proposed legislation.

加拿大政府表示，願意縮短擬議立法中要求電子服務供應商保留數位元數據的期限。

The legislative framework in question, Bill C-22, is bifurcated into two primary components. Part 1 facilitates expedited investigations by permitting authorities to verify whether specific individuals or numbers are serviced by telecommunications providers. This section has achieved relatively broad consensus. Conversely, Part 2 mandates that providers maintain technical capacities to assist the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and police in data acquisition, including the retention of transmission and location metadata.

目前討論的法律框架 C-22 法案分為兩個主要部分。第一部分透過允許當局核實特定個人或號碼是否由電信供應商提供服務，以加快調查進度。此部分已達成相對廣泛的共識。相反地，第二部分要求供應商必須維持技術能力，以協助加拿大安全情報局及警方獲取數據，包括保留傳輸與位置的元數據。

Institutional friction has emerged regarding the proposed one-year retention maximum. Academic perspectives, specifically from the University of Ottawa, suggest that such a mandate could facilitate the creation of comprehensive surveillance maps of the general population. Consequently, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree has shifted his position from a previous rejection of amendments to a current openness toward shortening this timeframe, with a proposed window of at least six months but less than one year. Furthermore, the administration intends to introduce amendments to clarify that encryption standards will remain uncompromised.

關於擬議的一年最高保留期，目前出現了機構間的分歧。學術界，特別是渥太華大學的觀點認為，此類指令可能會促成針對一般民眾的全面監控地圖。因此，公共安全部長 Gary Anandasangaree 改變了先前拒絕修正的立場，目前對縮短此期限持開放態度，建議的區間為至少六個月但少於一年。此外，政府打算引入修正案，明確表示加密標準將不會受到妥協。

Stakeholder positioning remains polarized. The Conservative party, via critic Frank Caputo, has proposed a legislative decoupling, suggesting the immediate passage of Part 1 while subjecting Part 2 to further scrutiny regarding ministerial orders and encryption. The government has formally dismissed the possibility of splitting the bill, maintaining that the legislation is necessary to align law enforcement capabilities with modern criminal exigencies while remaining consistent with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

持份者的立場依然兩極。保守黨透過批評者 Frank Caputo 建議將立法分開，建議第一部分立即通過，而第二部分關於部長命令與加密的部分則需進一步審查。政府正式拒絕了分拆法案的可能性，堅持認為該立法對於使執法能力符合現代犯罪的緊急需求至關重要，同時與《權利與自由憲章》保持一致。

The government is currently preparing to present these revised retention periods and encryption clarifications to the House of Commons public safety committee.

政府目前正準備將這些修正後的保留期限與加密澄清方案提交至下議院公共安全委員會。