The Supreme Court is looking at a case from Alabama. Alabama wants to kill a man named Jeffery Lee with nitrogen gas.

最高法院正在審理一起來自阿拉巴馬州的案件。阿拉巴馬州希望使用氮氣處決一名叫 Jeffery Lee 的男子。

Some judges say this gas is too cruel. They say the man will suffer for a long time before he dies. People saw other prisoners shake and struggle to breathe with this gas.

有些法官認為這種氣體太殘忍。他們表示該男子在死亡前將承受長時間的痛苦。人們曾看到其他囚犯在使用這種氣體時身體顫抖且呼吸困難。

Alabama says this gas is a good and kind way to kill. They say it is better than other methods. They want the court to let them use it.

阿拉巴馬州則主張這種氣體是一種良好且仁慈的處決方式。他們認為這比其他方法更好，並希望法院允許他們使用。

Jeffery Lee's lawyers say the gas is a dangerous experiment. They say it is torture. Also, a judge gave him the death penalty, but a jury did not want that.

Jeffery Lee 的律師則表示這種氣體是一場危險的實驗。他們認為這是折磨。此外，雖然一名法官判處其死刑，但陪審團並不贊成這樣做。

Jeffery Lee will not be killed now. He must wait for the Supreme Court to make a final decision.

Jeffery Lee 目前不會被處決。他必須等待最高法院做出最終決定。

The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing an emergency request from the State of Alabama. The state wants to continue with the execution of Jeffery Lee using nitrogen hypoxia, after lower courts disagreed on whether this method is legal under the Constitution.

美國最高法院目前正在審理阿拉巴馬州提交的緊急申請。在下級法院對此方法在憲法下是否合法存在分歧後，該州希望繼續使用氮氣窒息法處決 Jeffery Lee。

The legal argument focuses on the Eighth Amendment, which forbids 'cruel and unusual punishment.' The case has seen several changes in direction. Initially, Judge Emily Marks decided the method was legal, comparing it to older forms of punishment. However, after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, Judge Marks changed her ruling and blocked the method, stating that the evidence showed it violated constitutional rights.

法律爭論的焦點在於第八修正案，該修正案禁止「殘忍且不尋常的懲罰」。此案經歷了幾次方向轉變。最初，Emily Marks 法官判定該方法合法，將其與較早期的懲罰形式進行比較。然而，在美國第 11 巡迴上訴法院表示異議後，Marks 法官更改了裁決並阻止了該方法，指出證據顯示其違反了憲法權利。

The 11th Circuit Court argued that the process creates a 'substantial risk of serious harm.' Specifically, they emphasized that the one to three minutes it takes for a person to lose consciousness is 'intolerable' and causes severe breathing problems. These findings are supported by witnesses from previous executions who described inmates shaking and struggling to breathe. Furthermore, experts warned about risks such as brain damage or the inmate choking if the mask leaks.

第 11 巡迴法院認為該過程會造成「嚴重傷害的實質風險」。具體而言，他們強調一個人失去意識所需的一到三分鐘是「令人無法忍受的」，且會導致嚴重的呼吸問題。這些發現得到了先前處刑見證人的支持，他們描述囚犯在發抖並掙扎著呼吸。此外，專家警告可能存在腦損傷或面罩漏氣導致囚犯窒息等風險。

Opinions on the matter remain divided. Alabama officials assert that nitrogen hypoxia is a more humane alternative to lethal injection. On the other hand, Mr. Lee's lawyers and human rights groups argue that the method is experimental and could be considered torture. Additionally, the case is complicated by 'judicial override,' a practice where a judge ignores a jury's recommendation for life in prison. Although this practice was banned in Alabama in 2017, it was not applied to older cases like Mr. Lee's.

對此事的看法依然分歧。阿拉巴馬州官員堅稱，氮氣窒息法比致命注射是更人道的替代方案。另一方面，Lee 先生的律師與人權團體則認為該方法具有實驗性質，可被視為酷刑。此外，此案因「司法否決」而變得複雜，這是一種法官無視陪審團建議終身監禁之做法。雖然這種做法於 2017 年在阿拉巴馬州被禁止，但並未應用於像 Lee 先生這樣的舊案中。

The execution of Jeffery Lee is currently on hold while the Supreme Court decides if Alabama's nitrogen hypoxia method is legally valid.

在最高法院決定阿拉巴馬州的氮氣窒息法是否合法之前，Jeffery Lee 的處刑目前暫停。

The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing an emergency petition from the State of Alabama to reinstate the execution of Jeffery Lee via nitrogen hypoxia following conflicting lower court rulings on the method's constitutionality.

由於下級法院對該執行方法是否違憲的裁決不一致，美國最高法院目前正在審理阿拉巴馬州提交的緊急請願，要求恢復對 Jeffery Lee 執行氮氣窒息死刑。

The legal dispute centers on the application of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. The procedural history of the case is characterized by judicial volatility: U.S. District Judge Emily Marks initially deemed the nitrogen hypoxia protocol constitutional, citing an originalist interpretation that compared the method favorably to historical punishments such as burning at the stake. However, following a reversal by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Marks subsequently issued a permanent injunction against the method, concluding that the preponderance of evidence indicated a violation of constitutional protections.

這場法律爭議的核心在於美國憲法第八修正案禁止「殘忍且不尋常之懲罰」的應用。該案的程序歷史具有司法波動性：美國地方法院法官 Emily Marks 最初認定氮氣窒息程序合憲，引用原意主義的解釋，認為該方法相較於歷史上的懲罰（如火刑）較為寬容。然而，在美國第 11 巡迴上訴法院推翻裁決後，Marks 法官隨後對該方法發出了永久禁制令，結論是證據顯示該做法違反了憲法保障。

The 11th Circuit's determination rested on the assertion that the protocol presents a 'substantial risk of serious harm.' The court characterized the one-to-three-minute interval required for an inmate to lose consciousness as 'intolerable,' citing evidence of profound respiratory distress. These judicial findings are supported by eyewitness accounts from previous executions in Alabama and Louisiana, which described inmates exhibiting labored breathing, shaking, and prolonged physical distress. Furthermore, expert testimony highlighted risks such as aspiration of vomit and potential brain damage resulting from mask leaks.

第 11 巡迴法院的判定基於該程序存在「嚴重傷害之實質風險」。法院將囚犯失去意識前所需的一至三分鐘時間定調為「無法忍受」，並引用了呼吸極度困難的證據。這些司法調查結果得到了阿拉巴馬州與路易斯安那州先前執行死刑時目擊者證詞的支持，描述囚犯出現呼吸困難、顫抖及長時間身體痛苦。此外，專家證詞強調了如嘔吐物吸入及面罩漏氣導致潛在腦損傷等風險。

Stakeholder positioning remains polarized. The Alabama Attorney General's Office maintains that nitrogen hypoxia is a humane alternative to lethal injection and argues that the current judicial restrictions are unprecedented. Conversely, legal representatives for Mr. Lee and international human rights observers characterize the method as experimental and potentially torturous. The case is further complicated by the historical context of Mr. Lee's sentencing; his death sentence was the result of 'judicial override,' a practice wherein a judge disregards a jury's recommendation for life imprisonment, a mechanism abolished in Alabama in 2017 but not applied retroactively.

相關利益方的立場依然兩極分化。阿拉巴馬州總檢察長辦公室堅持認為氮氣窒息是比致命注射更人道的替代方案，並主張目前的司法限制是前所未有的。相反，Lee 先生的法律代表與國際人權觀察員將該方法描述為實驗性質且具有潛在酷刑色彩。該案因 Lee 先生被判刑的歷史背景而 further 複雜化；其死刑是「司法覆蓋」（judicial override）的結果，即法官無視陪審團建議終身監禁而判處死刑，此機制雖於 2017 年在阿拉巴馬州被廢除，但不溯及既往。

The execution of Jeffery Lee remains suspended pending a final determination by the Supreme Court regarding the validity of Alabama's nitrogen hypoxia protocol.

由於最高法院尚未對阿拉巴馬州氮氣窒息程序的有效性作出最終決定，Jeffery Lee 的死刑目前仍處於暫緩執行狀態。