Some people manage OnlyFans accounts. Many of these managers are bad. They hurt and steal from the creators.

有些人負責管理 OnlyFans 帳號。其中許多經理表現不良，他們會傷害創作者並盜取款項。

Managers promise to make more money for the creators. Then, they take a lot of the money. They take the account passwords. They change the bank details and steal the money.

經理承諾會幫創作者賺更多錢。接著，他們會抽走大量款項。他們取得帳號密碼，更改銀行資料並盜走金錢。

Some managers are very mean. They tell creators to do things they do not want to do. Some managers use threats. One manager sent scary people to a woman's house.

有些經理非常惡劣。他們強迫創作者做不想做的事情。有些經理甚至使用威脅手段。其中一名經理甚至派遣恐嚇人員前往一名女性家中。

OnlyFans says they are not responsible for these managers. But some lawyers disagree. They say OnlyFans must protect the people on the site. There are no rules for these managers now.

OnlyFans 表示他們不需要為這些經理負責。但有些律師並不認同，認為 OnlyFans 必須保護網站上的使用者。目前這些經理並沒有任何規範。

Creators are in danger. OnlyFans does not do enough to help them.

創作者處於危險之中。OnlyFans 在幫助他們方面的努力不足。

Recent reports and a documentary have revealed a widespread network of third-party managers who use pressure and violence to exploit content creators on the OnlyFans platform.

最近的報告和一部紀錄片揭露了一個廣泛的第三方經紀人網絡，他們利用壓力與暴力來剝削 OnlyFans 平台上的內容創作者。

The rise of 'OnlyFans Managers' (OFMs) has created a market where agents promise to increase a creator's income in exchange for a large share of their earnings, often between 30% and 70%. However, evidence shows that these professional deals often become abusive. By taking control of account passwords, managers can hide the actual amount of money earned and change banking details to steal funds.

「OnlyFans 經紀人」(OFMs) 的興起創造了一個市場，經紀人承諾能增加創作者的收入，以換取其高額的分成，通常在 30% 至 70% 之間。然而，證據顯示這些專業協議往往演變成虐待。經紀人透過控制帳號密碼，可以隱瞞實際獲利金額，並更改銀行帳號以盜取資金。

Testimonies from victims show that this situation often leads to severe abuse. Some creators reported psychological manipulation and were forced to produce explicit content against their will. In one extreme case, masked attackers were sent to a creator's home after she tried to regain control of her account. Furthermore, messages from a Telegram group called 'OFM Empire' show that managers share strategies to control creators, including selling creator contracts to other agents without permission.

受害者的證詞顯示，這種情況經常導致嚴重的虐待。部分創作者舉報遭受心理操縱，並被強迫製作違背意願的露骨內容。在一個極端案例中，一名創作者在嘗試重新取得帳號控制權後，竟有戴面具的攻擊者前往其家中。此外，一個名為「OFM Empire」的 Telegram 群組訊息顯示，經紀人會分享控制創作者的策略，包括在未經許可的情況下將創作者的合約轉賣給其他經紀人。

Responses from authorities have been mixed. Fenix International Limited, the company that runs OnlyFans, claims it is not responsible for external contracts and insists its safety rules are enough. On the other hand, legal experts and the UK's anti-slavery commissioner argue that the platform may be breaking the law by failing to stop this exploitation. Because OFMs are not licensed or regulated, critics argue that a dangerous gap exists that allows this predatory behavior to continue.

當局的反應不一。營運 OnlyFans 的 Fenix International Limited 公司聲稱其對外部合約不負責任，並堅持其安全規則已足夠。另一方面，法律專家與英國反奴隸專員則認為，該平台因未能阻止此類剝削而可能違法。由於 OFM 並未經過許可或監管，批評者認為這造成了一個危險漏洞，導致此類掠奪行為得以持續。

The situation remains dangerous, as creators face a high risk of abuse while the platform continues to distance itself from the problem.

情況依然危險，因為創作者面臨高度被虐待的風險，而平台則繼續與此問題保持距離。

A series of reports and a documentary have identified a pervasive network of third-party managers who employ coercive and violent tactics to exploit content creators on the OnlyFans platform.

一系列報告與一部紀錄片揭露了一個普遍存在的第三方管理網絡，他們利用強制手段與暴力恐嚇來剝削 OnlyFans 平台的內容創作者。

The emergence of 'OnlyFans Managers' (OFMs) has facilitated a secondary market where agents promise revenue growth in exchange for significant percentages of creator earnings, often ranging from 30% to 70%. Evidence suggests that these arrangements frequently transition from professional services to exploitative dynamics. The procurement of account credentials allows managers to exercise total administrative control, enabling the falsification of earnings reports and the unauthorized alteration of banking details to divert funds.

「OnlyFans 管理員」（OFM）的出現催生了一個二級市場，經紀人承諾能增加收入，但要求分走創作者 30% 到 70% 的大量收益。證據顯示，這些合作關係經常從專業服務演變為剝削關係。經紀人取得帳號登入資料後即可行使完全的管理控制權，使其能夠偽造收益報告，並在未經授權的情況下更改銀行資料以轉移資金。

Stakeholder testimonies indicate a progression toward severe coercion. In documented instances, creators reported psychological manipulation, pressure to produce explicit content contrary to prior agreements, and direct threats of violence. One specific case involved the dispatch of masked assailants to a creator's residence following her attempt to secure account access. Furthermore, internal communications within a Telegram group titled 'OFM Empire' reveal the dissemination of strategies designed to maintain dominance over creators, including the unauthorized sale of creator contracts between agents.

利益相關者的證詞指出，情況逐漸演變為嚴重的強迫行為。在有紀錄的案例中，創作者表示受到心理操縱，被施壓要求製作與先前協議相悖的露骨內容，甚至受到直接的暴力威脅。其中一個具體案例是，一名創作者在嘗試重新獲取帳號權限後，有人派遣戴面具的襲擊者前往其住家。此外，一個名為「OFM Empire」的 Telegram 群組內部對話揭露了旨在維持對創作者支配地位的策略，包括經紀人之間私下買賣創作者的合約。

Institutional responses remain divergent. Fenix International Limited, the operator of OnlyFans, maintains that it is not a party to external contractual agreements and asserts that its safety protocols are sufficient. However, legal experts and human rights officials, including the UK's independent anti-slavery commissioner, contend that the platform's failure to intervene in reported exploitation may constitute a breach of legal duties. The current regulatory environment is characterized by a lack of licensing for OFMs, which critics argue creates a vacuum enabling predatory behavior.

機構方面的反應不一。OnlyFans 的營運商 Fenix International Limited 主張其並非外部合約協議的參與方，並聲稱其安全協定已經足夠。然而，法律專家與人權官員（包括英國獨立反奴隸專員）認為，平台對於已通報的剝削行為未能介入，可能構成違反法律責任。目前的監管環境缺乏對 OFM 的執照管理，批評者認為這種真空狀態為掠奪行為提供了機會。

The situation remains critical, with creators facing significant risks of abuse while the platform maintains a detached operational stance.

情況依然嚴峻，創作者面臨著顯著的受虐風險，而平台則維持著一種抽離的營運立場。