Veeraswamy is a famous Indian restaurant in London. The owners are fighting with the landlord, the Crown Estate, about their building.

Veeraswamy 是倫敦一家著名的印度餐廳。店主目前正與地主 Crown Estate 就建築物問題發生爭執。

The landlord wants the restaurant to leave. The landlord says the building is old and needs new work. The owners say the restaurant is important for history and culture.

地主希望餐廳搬遷。地主表示建築物過於老舊，需要重新修繕。而店主則認為這家餐廳對歷史與文化具有重要意義。

The owners offered to pay more money. They also offered to help with the building work. The landlord said no to these ideas.

店主曾提出增加租金，並表示願意協助建築修繕工程。然而，地主拒絕了這些方案。

Many people signed a letter to King Charles III. The owners also asked the Indian government for help. They want the two countries to work together to save the restaurant.

許多人聯署寫信給查理斯三世國王。店主也向印度政府尋求協助，希望兩國能共同合作以保留這家餐廳。

A judge will listen to both sides in court starting June 29.

法官將於 6 月 29 日起在法院聽取雙方陳述。

The owners of Veeraswamy, a famous historic Indian restaurant in London, are currently in a legal battle with the Crown Estate because their lease was not renewed.

倫敦著名歷史印度餐廳 Veeraswamy 的所有者目前正與皇室領地管理局 (Crown Estate) 進行法律鬥爭，因為他們的租約未獲續約。

The conflict focuses on Victory House, a protected historic building managed by the Crown Estate for the UK Treasury. The landlord claims that the building needs a complete renovation to meet modern standards, which makes it impossible to renew the lease. However, the owning company, MW Eat, argues that the restaurant is a vital part of cultural heritage due to its links with Mahatma Gandhi and the British royal family. Consequently, they believe that moving the restaurant would be a great loss to history.

衝突焦點在於 Victory House，這是一棟由皇室領地管理局代表英國財政部管理的受保護歷史建築。房東聲稱該建築需要全面翻新才能符合現代標準，因此無法續約。然而，所有者公司 MW Eat 主張，由於該餐廳與聖雄甘地及英國皇室有聯繫，是文化遺產中至關重要的一部分。因此，他們認為搬遷餐廳將是歷史的一大損失。

To avoid being evicted, MW Eat has suggested several solutions. For example, they offered to manage the renovation project themselves or pay rent equal to what the building would earn if converted into offices. They also emphasized that the ongoing legal fight and loss of rent are costing the British taxpayer a significant amount of money. Despite these offers, the Crown Estate insists that none of these options meet their legal duties to protect the building or maximize its public value.

為了避免被驅逐，MW Eat 提出了幾項解決方案。例如，他們提議由自己管理翻新工程，或支付與將建築轉換為辦公室時等同的租金。他們還強調，持續的法律鬥爭和租金損失正使英國納稅人付出巨額金錢成本。儘管有這些提議，皇室領地管理局仍堅持這些方案均不符合其保護建築或最大化公共價值的法律職責。

At the same time, the owners have looked for outside help. After a petition with over 20,000 signatures was sent to King Charles III, Ranjit Mathrani asked the Indian government to intervene. He argued that the restaurant represents Indian 'soft power' and that saving it would support the improving relationship between India and the UK, especially as the two countries work toward a new Free Trade Agreement.

與此同時，所有者也尋求外部協助。在向查理三世國王呈交一份擁有超過 2 萬個簽名的請願書後，Ranjit Mathrani 要求印度政府介入。他主張該餐廳代表了印度的「軟實力」，拯救它將有助於支持印度與英國之間不斷改善的關係，尤其是在兩國努力達成新自由貿易協定的背景下。

The case is now waiting for a five-day court hearing at the Central London County Court, which begins on June 29.

本案目前正等待在倫敦中心郡法院進行為期五天的聆訊，將於 6 月 29 日開始。

The ownership group of Veeraswamy, a historic Indian establishment in London, is engaged in a legal conflict with the Crown Estate over the non-renewal of its lease.

倫敦歷史悠久的印度餐廳 Veeraswamy 的所有權團隊，目前正與皇室領地管理局（Crown Estate）就租約不續約的問題進行法律鬥爭。

The dispute centers on Victory House, a Grade II listed property managed by the Crown Estate for the benefit of the UK Treasury. The landlord asserts that the necessity for comprehensive refurbishment to meet modern standards precludes the renewal of the lease. Conversely, MW Eat, the owning entity, contends that the building's historical significance—including its association with Mahatma Gandhi and various members of the British royal family—renders the relocation of the establishment an erasure of cultural heritage.

這場爭議的核心是 Victory House，這是一棟由皇室領地管理局（Crown Estate）管理、為英國財政部獲益的二級法定古蹟。業主主張，為了符合現代標準而必須進行全面翻修，因此無法續約。相反地，所有權實體 MW Eat 認為，該建築具有深厚的歷史意義——包括其與甘地及多位英國皇室成員的關聯——將餐廳遷離將導致文化遺產的抹除。

In an attempt to mitigate the eviction, MW Eat has proposed several alternatives, including the assumption of project management for the refurbishment and the provision of rental payments equivalent to those generated by office conversions. The ownership further posits that the ongoing litigation and loss of rent have resulted in significant fiscal detriment to the British taxpayer. Despite these overtures, the Crown Estate maintains that no proposed alternative satisfies its statutory obligations as a steward of the heritage asset or its mandate to maximize public value.

為了減緩被驅逐的情況，MW Eat 提出了幾項替代方案，包括承接翻修工程的項目管理，以及支付與辦公室轉型相當的租金。所有權方進一步指出，目前的訴訟和租金損失已對英國納稅人造成顯著的財政損害。儘管有這些提議，皇室領地管理局仍堅持認為，沒有任何替代方案能滿足其作為文化遺產管理人之法定責任，或其最大化公眾價值的指令。

Parallel to the legal proceedings, the stakeholders have sought external intervention. Following a petition signed by over 20,000 individuals submitted to King Charles III, Ranjit Mathrani has formally requested the Indian government's involvement. This appeal is predicated on the notion that the restaurant serves as an instrument of Indian soft power, suggesting that a resolution in favor of the tenant would align with the current trajectory of India-UK bilateral rapprochement and the impending implementation of a Free Trade Agreement.

在法律程序並行之際，利害關係人也尋求外部干預。在向查理三世國王提交一份由超過 2 萬人簽署的請願書後，Ranjit Mathrani 正式要求印度政府介入。此次呼籲是基於該餐廳被視為印度軟實力的工具，認為若能達成有利於租方的解決方案，將符合目前英印雙邊關係改善的趨勢以及即將實施的自由貿易協定。

The matter is currently pending a five-day hearing at the Central London County Court commencing June 29.

此案目前正等待 6 月 29 日開始、為期五天的倫敦中區郡法院聆訊。