Some EU countries want to build centers for migrants in other countries. The European Parliament says this is now legal.

部分歐盟國家希望在其他國家建立移民中心。歐洲議會表示這目前是合法的。

The new law says people without legal papers must leave the EU. The EU can build 'return hubs' in other countries. These hubs must follow human rights laws. Children alone cannot go to these hubs.

新法規定沒有合法證件的人必須離開歐盟。歐盟可以在其他國家建立「遣返中心」。這些中心必須遵守人權法。單獨一人且無人陪伴的兒童不得前往這些中心。

Nineteen countries, like Italy and Poland, want money from the EU for these hubs. They like the model Italy used with Albania. They think it works well.

包括義大利和波蘭在內的十九個國家，希望歐盟為這些中心提供資金。他們認同義大利在阿爾巴尼亞採用的模式，認為該模式運作良好。

France and Spain do not like this plan. President Macron says these centers are not good. He says the EU should not pay for them because it is not fair.

法國和西班牙並不認同這個計劃。馬克龍總統表示這些中心並不理想。他認為歐盟不應出資，因為這樣並不公平。

Many EU countries want these centers, but France says no.

許多歐盟國家希望建立這些中心，但法國表示反對。

A group of European Union member states is calling for the quick setup of migrant return centers in countries outside the EU, following the approval of a new legal framework by the European Parliament.

在歐洲議會通過新法律框架後，一組歐盟成員國呼籲在歐盟以外的國家快速建立移民遣返中心。

The legal basis for this plan was created through a reform package agreed upon on June 1 and later approved by the European Parliament. This new rule requires people without legal residency to leave the EU within a set time. Furthermore, it allows for the creation of 'return hubs' in third countries, as long as these centers follow international law and human rights standards. However, unaccompanied minors are specifically excluded from this process.

此計劃的法律依據是透過 6 月 1 日達成協議並隨後由歐洲議會批准的改革方案而建立的。這項新規定要求沒有合法居留權的人員在設定的時間內離開歐盟。此外，只要這些中心符合國際法和人權標準，就允許在第三國建立「遣返樞紐」。然而，無人陪伴的未成年人被明確排除在此程序之外。

There is a clear division among EU members regarding this plan. Nineteen countries, including Italy, Denmark, and Poland, have asked the European Commission for money to help organize these centers. They believe the model used between Italy and Albania is a successful example of modern migration management. In contrast, France and Spain have not joined this effort. President Emmanuel Macron has stated that these centers are neither effective nor ethical, asserting that using EU funds for such facilities would go against European values.

歐盟成員國對此計劃存在明顯分歧。包括義大利、丹麥和波蘭在內的 19 個國家已向歐盟委員會申請資金以協助組織這些中心。他們認為義大利與阿爾巴尼亞之間採用的模式是現代移民管理的成功案例。相比之下，法國和西班牙則未加入此行動。總統馬克龍表示，這些中心既無效果也不符合倫理，並聲明將歐盟資金用於此類設施將違背歐洲價值觀。

Despite these disagreements, the European Council remains committed to its overall migration policy. In its latest report, the Council emphasized the need to increase efforts regarding migration from outside the EU. Consequently, they aim to build strong partnerships with non-EU countries while ensuring that all actions follow international law.

儘管存在這些分歧，歐洲理事會仍致力於其整體移民政策。在最新報告中，理事會強調需要加大對歐盟以外移民問題的努力。因此，他們旨在與非歐盟國家建立強有力的夥伴關係，同時確保所有行動均符合國際法。

The European Union is currently experiencing a divided implementation phase, where most member states want to start using return hubs in third countries, while France continues to oppose their use and funding.

歐盟目前正處於一個分歧的執行階段，大多數成員國希望開始在第三國使用遣返樞紐，而法國則繼續反對其使用與資助。

A coalition of European Union member states is advocating for the rapid deployment of migrant return centers in non-EU territories following the legislative approval of a new return framework by the European Parliament.

在歐洲議會通過新的遣返框架立法後，一群歐盟成員國正倡議在非歐盟領土快速部署移民遣返中心。

The legislative foundation for this initiative was established via a reform package provisionally agreed upon on June 1 and subsequently ratified by the European Parliament. This regulatory framework mandates that individuals lacking legal residency must depart the Union within specified timeframes and permits the establishment of 'return hubs' in third countries, provided such facilities adhere to international legal obligations and human rights standards, with a specific exemption for unaccompanied minors.

此項倡議的立法基礎是透過 6 月 1 日初步達成協議、隨後由歐洲議會批准的一項改革方案而建立。該監管框架規定，缺乏合法居留權的人士必須在指定時間內離開歐盟，並允許在第三國建立「遣返中心」，前提是此類設施必須遵守國際法律義務與人權標準，且對未成年陪伴者有特別豁免。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a significant schism within the bloc. A coalition of nineteen member states, including Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, Poland, Austria, Greece, and Hungary, has formally petitioned the European Commission for budgetary support to facilitate these arrangements. This group cites the Italian-Albanian model as a viable precedent for innovative migration management. Conversely, France and Spain have abstained from this initiative. President Emmanuel Macron has explicitly rejected the efficacy and ethical alignment of such centers, asserting that the utilization of EU funds for these facilities would be inappropriate and inconsistent with European values.

利益相關者的立場顯示出歐盟內部存在嚴重分歧。包括義大利、丹麥、荷蘭、波蘭、奧地利、希臘與匈牙利在內的 19 個成員國，已正式向歐盟委員會申請預算支持，以利於實施這些安排。該群組將義大利-阿爾巴尼亞模式視為創新移民管理的可行先例。相反地，法國與西班牙則對此項倡議採取棄權態度。總統馬克宏明確拒絕了此類中心的效能與倫理一致性，主張將歐盟資金用於這些設施是不恰當的，且與歐洲價值觀不符。

Despite these internal contradictions, the European Council has maintained a commitment to the broader migration policy agenda. In its most recent conclusions, the Council emphasized the necessity of intensifying efforts regarding the external dimension of migration and the cultivation of comprehensive partnerships with third-country entities, ensuring all actions remain compliant with established international law.

儘管內部存在矛盾，歐洲理事會仍維持對更廣泛移民政策議程的承諾。在最近的結論中，理事會強調有必要強化移民的外部維度工作，並與第三國實體建立全面的合作夥伴關係，確保所有行動均符合既有的國際法。

The European Union currently faces a fragmented implementation phase, where a majority of member states seek to operationalize third-country return hubs while France maintains a principled opposition to their utility and funding.

歐盟目前面臨碎片化的實施階段，大多數成員國尋求啟動第三國遣返中心，而法國則在原則上反對其效用與資金撥款。